Category: Human evolution and migrations

Teeth found in Chinese caves reveal a connection between Homo erectus and Denisovans

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

Hominin fossils referred to as Homo erectus have been found in Africa, Central Europe and China. Those from Africa have also been attributed to H. ergaster and by some to ‘African H. erectus’– a point of lingering dispute and confusion. The African lineage spanned a long time period after appearing around 1.7 Ma ago, possibly to as late as 0.6 Ma. The confusion deepened with the discovery of similar, well-preserved remains at Dmanisi in Georgia that are actually older (1.77–1.85 Ma) than the African specimens. But they are so anatomically diverse that the five skulls might easily be assigned to five different hominin species had they been found at separate locations. Asia is again very odd in an H. erectus context. The species was first proposed in 1891 by Eugene Dubois from remains in sediments oof the Solo River near Trinil in Java – he originally suggested the name Pithecanthropus erectus.  Remarkably, the Solo sediments were dated at 53 to 27 ka in 2019, so did Homo erectus co-exist with anatomically modern humans (AMH) on Java? Similarly heavy-browed crania emerged from several sites in China. Curiously, the first complete Denisovan cranium, found near Harbin in China matched H. erectus in the eyebrow department. However, mtDNA from its dental plaque and bone proteomics tie in with those found in fragments from the eponymous Denisova Cave in Siberia and with a fragmentary mandible from Tibet. Without such evidence, and were itnot so young (146 ka), most palaeoanthropologists would probably have called the Harbin individual H. erectus, There are quite a few records of older Chinese hominin crania, dubbed H. erectus on anatomical grounds, including one dated at 1.7 Ma. There are a great many oddities and contradictions that need resolving.

Skulls of Homo erectus from Dmanisi , Georgia (credits; M.S. Ponce de Leon & P.E. Zollkofer, University of Zurich)
The cranium found near Harbin, China belonged to a Denisovan. Credit: Hebei Geo University

On 13 May 2026 a team led by palaeogeneticist Qiaomei Fu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences published data on proteins and amino acids yielded by enamel from six teeth of these ancient Chinese fossils, which emerged from three localities of  Middle Pleistocene age (580 to 400 ka) (Fu, Q. and 11 others 2026. Enamel proteins from six Homo erectus specimens across China. Nature, v.  10.1038/s41586-026-10478-8). One is from the Zhoukoudian Cave near Beijing, famous for ‘Peking Man’, the primary reference for the anatomy of Asian H. erectus. Older fossils are unlikely to yield meaningful data of this kind because of chemical degradation; the reason why DNA has so far proved elusive from these specimens. Tooth enamel is extremely durable and can protect proteins and amino acids. Since both are produced by genes on DNA they are proxies for variants of those long-vanished genes

The key protein in the supposed H. erectus teeth isameloblastin which is involved in the formation of tooth enamel. The ameloblastin of all six teeth shared two amino acid variants; one previously unknown in other hominin lineages and perhaps unique to H. erectus, the other has been identified in Denisovans. Fu and colleagues suggest that the original bearers of the teeth – presumed to be H. erectus – had interbred with Denisovans and passed on the second variant gene. In turn that had been passed on to Asian AMH with some of whom Denisovans had interbred; remarkably 21% of living people on the Philippine archipelago carry that gene. The authors go on further to suggest that their findings support the notion that H. erectus was the source by gene-flow for ‘super-archaic’ sections of DNA found in actual Denisovan DNA from one member of that group. That is certainly a possibility, but is not the only one.

Neither the proteomics nor the morphology of the teeth, nor the anatomy of the fossils that accompany them in any way prove that they are from actual 400 ka old Homo erectus individuals. That would require at the very least protein analyses from specimens that definitely pre-date the divergence of Denisovans from Neanderthals about 600 ka ago. Remarkably, proteins have been extracted from a ~1.8 Ma old tooth yielded by the Dmanisi H. erectus site in Georgia, but that failed to reveal anything useful in this context. Maybe future work on older Chinese hominin teeth could resolve the issue. Another hypothesis is that the bearers of the analysed teeth were a population of Denisovans who themselves developed genetic variations rather than inheriting them. Proteomics is at about the same stage in its development as human genomics was before 2010 in the run-up to discovering Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes. But in the case of H. erectus the problem began with biologists’ long record of trying to simplify the natural world, especially fossils, through ‘lumping’ rather than ‘splitting’.

Humans that science has designated as different species were capable of interbreeding over tens and hundreds of thousand years, probably repeatedly and maybe habitually. That fact makes it hard to defend the concept of their speciation. There were few environments where they could not thrive, yet their migrations spread small numbers over vast areas. Continually shifting, isolated populations would diverge genetically and physically, the more so the fewer individuals were banded together. Occasionally populations would meet: an opportunity for celebration, and more, for conscious beings facing the rigours of exploration with neither territory nor resources to defend.

See also: What Homo erectus teeth from three Chinese caves tell us about who we are. Anthropology.net, 13 May 2026; Curry, A. 2026. Ghost of long-extinct ancestor lives on in people today. Science, v.  392, p. 677-678; DOI:10.1126/science.zuwthcn; Timmer, J. 2026. Protein in Homo erectus teeth suggests Denisovans gave us some of their DNA. Arstechnica, 13 May 2026; Marshall, M. 2026. Ancient teeth hint at links between Denisovans and Homo erectus. New Scientist 13 May 2026

Rapid human genetic changes after the last Ice Age

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

Our hominin ancestors in Africa first fashioned tools about 3.5 Ma ago. Since then regular intake of animal protein through hunting, followed by the later discovery of fire and cooking, may progressively have encouraged the evolution of larger hominin brains. Both behavioural leaps would have reduced the length of the ‘working day’ needed to sustain hominin groups. That would have lengthened opportunities for cognitive reflection. social life and culture, and thus further evolution. They also expanded the opportunities for migration, beginning with Homo ergaster venturing beyond Africa at least 1.8 Ma ago. Hominins evolved to such an extent that several separate species occupied our home world at any one time until about 45 thousand years ago. After that only H. sapiens occupied Africa, Eurasia and Australasia.

Such protracted and meandering evolution and dispersal clearly involved episodic physiological and cultural changes, but all we have to go on are fragmentary fossil remains and artifacts of various kinds. DNA has yet to be extracted from hominin bones older than 400 ka (an early Neanderthal from northern Spain). Though H. sapiens first appeared in Morocco about 300 ka ago, DNA from our species dates back to only 45 ka (western and central Europe). What is today termed ‘ancient’ human DNA, is actually very young and restricted to climate zones where its decomposition has been slow. At present there is little point in analysing fossil material from tropical and subtropical latitudes; the DNA is degraded beyond recovery by even the most up-to-date techniques. Fascinating as discussion of human evolution is, in reality most is merely inferred from comparative anatomy and anthropological interpretation.

By 45 ka the heavy evolutionary lifting had been done, resulting in anatomically modern humans, but we have little, if any, chance of explaining in genetic terms how it was achieved. There has been much speculation about the conditions, particularly climatic ones, which may have driven the changes. During the last 2.6 Ma – the Quaternary Period – global climate has been the most changeable in the last 300 Ma. Ice ages have come and gone, first in 40 ka cycles and during the last million years every 100 ka. Much more rapid changes, such as millennial Dansgaard-Oeschger cycles, appeared during each glacial episode, the last being the Younger Dryas between 12.9 and 11.7 ka. For a long while ideas on the drivers of human evolution have been dominated by those concerning environmental stress. Unsurprisingly, genetic change has also been ascribed to such a Darwinian-ecological cause: adaptability to adversity. To test such a hypothesis requires genetic data, of course. But, except for the climatically more stable Holocene Epoch since 11.7 ka, ancient human genomes are in very short supply.

Renowned researcher into ancient human genetics David Reich of the Harvard Medical School in Boston, USA has collated more than 15 thousand ancient human genomes extracted from the remains of individuals who lived and died in Europe and parts of the Middle East during the last ten thousand years. These have been analysed statistically in the context of ‘directional selection’. This is a type of natural selection that occurs when one version of a gene – an allele – confers an extreme form of a trait. If it proves advantageous it rapidly gets passed on to more descendants than do less advantageous alleles, and thus rises in frequency across a population. This differs from other causes of gene frequency changes, such as human migration, population mixing, and random genetic fluctuations that occur in small populations. Well-known examples of directional selection are rapid changes among European Peppered moths, African cichlid fish, Alaskan Sockeye salmon and Big Cats which change over time in response to variations in their habitats. A human example is a genetic variant that maintains the ability to digest the sugar lactose in milk beyond infancy, which enables many modern Europeans to digest milk throughout their lives. The algorithm needed to separate signs of directional selection from other types of genetic change was developed by Ali Akbari, a computational geneticist also at Harvard Medical School. A recent paper by Akbari, Reich and colleagues in the US, Iran, Germany, and Austria (Akbari, A. and 15 others 2026. Ancient DNA reveals pervasive directional selection across West Eurasia. Nature, advance online publication; DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10358-1) seems set dramatically to change the research into recent human evolutionary genetics.

Akbari et al. discovered that directional selection has driven the spread or decline of hundreds of gene variants in human populations throughout Western Europe in the last ten millennia. In particular, selection accelerated with the adoption of farming rather than a hunter-gatherer lifestyle.  Among the gene variants are those connected with light skin, red hair, risk of celiac disease – linked to gluten in cereals –  susceptibility to gout, resistance to leprosy, baldness, rheumatoid arthritis and alcoholism. There are many more (see Figure 3 in the paper): the team identified 479 gene variants affected by directional selection, some that can be explained by changes in lifestyle, others less explicable and yet more that underlie complex traits such as mental illness and cognition. Some of the variants sprang up and were sustained in the population, others rose and then dwindled. The Neolithic began a period of fundamental life style changes in Europe, summed up as a shift from hunting and foraging to farming of cereals and livestock, as early as about 10 ka ago in what is now Türkiye. The pace of genetic changes of this kind reached a peak around the Bronze Age, perhaps because human activities in Europe became more complex then with the mass migration westwards of Yamnaya horse- and wagon-using people from the steppes to dominate Europe

The shift from small wandering bands to living in settlements was a drastic change from a lifestyle that had continued throughout all previous human history. So, it is hardly surprising that there was a major shift in humans’ genetic makeup. But such a change in human labour was not unique to Europe and is known to have occurred on all inhabited continents, with the exception of Australia, at different times during the Holocene. Other regional genetic databases can be analysed in much the same way, once sufficient ancient DNA is collected in Asia, Africa and the Americas. Yet not much is available. The authors comment: ‘A variant that now correlates to household income or years of schooling [remarkably, there are some!] had to have meant something different in the Stone Age. So these results do not mean that Europeans evolved to be smarter or healthier.’  Moreover, the research results in the paper seem likely to be amplified as the data set is so large and complex.

See also: Dutchen, S. et al. 2026. Massive Ancient-DNA Study Reveals Natural Selection Has Accelerated in Recent Human Evolution. Harvard Medical School: News & Events. 15 April 2026; Callaway, E. 2026. Landmark ancient-genome study shows surprise acceleration of human evolution. Nature, v. 652, News, 15 April 2026

Annual logs update

Published on by zooks7771 Comment

Followers can now download newly posted annual logs for Human Evolution and Migrations covering the years 2022 to 2025. By downloading them you can get a clear idea of how palaeoanthropology has moved forward since the Covid pandemic.

Enjoy the experience if you have the time and inclination!

Steve Drury

Advances in hominin evolution

Published on by zooks7772 Comments

For decades, most of the news concerning our deep ancestry emerged from discoveries in sub-Saharan Africa at sites in Zambia, Tanzania, Kenya, South Africa, Ethiopia. The first week of 2026 decisively shifted that focus northwards to Chad and Morocco in two separate publications.

In 2002 ago the world of palaeoanthropology was in turmoil following the first discovery of fragments of what was then thought to be a hominid, or great-ape, cranium in Chad dated at around 7 Ma ago (Brunet, M. and 37 others 2002. A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, central Africa. Nature, v. 4418, p. 145-151;DOI:10.1038/nature00879). When pieced together the cranium looked like a cross between that of a chimpanzee and an australopithecine. Some suggested that the creature may have been a ‘missing link’ between the hominids and hominins; perhaps the ultimate ancestor of humans. Sahelanthropus tchadensis (nicknamedToumaï­ or ‘hope of life’ in the local Goran language) was undoubtedly enigmatic. The ‘molecular-clock’ age estimate for the branching of hominins from a common ancestor with chimpanzees was, in 2002, judged to be two million years later the dating of Sahelanthropus, so controversy was inevitable. Another point of contention was the size of Sahelanthropus’s canine teeth: too large for australopithecines and humans, but more appropriate for a gorilla or chimp. Moreover, Toumaï­ showed no indisputable evidence for having been bipedal. The Chadian site subsequently yielded three lower jaw bones and a collection of teeth, a partial femur (leg bone) and three fragmentary ulnae (forearm bones). The finds suggested that as many as five individuals had been fossilised. The femur gave an unresolved hint of an upright gait, yet the ulnas suggested Toumaï­ might equally have been arboreal; as could also be said for the australopithecines.

Reconstructed skull of Sahelanthropus tchadensis. (Credit: Didier Descouens, University of Toulouse)

All the limb bones of Toumaï­have now been anatomically compared with those of hominins and apes (Williams S.A. et al. 2026. Earliest evidence of hominin bipedalism in Sahelanthropus tchadensis. Science Advances, v. 12, article eadv0130; DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adv0130). Scott Williams of New York University and co-workers from other US institutions show that although the leg bones are much the same size as those of chimpanzees, their proportions were more like those of hominins. They also showed features around the knees and hips needed for bipedalism and an insertion point for a tendon for the gluteus maximus muscle (buttock) vital for sustained upright locomotion, similar to the femurs of Orrorin tugenensis (see: Orrorin walked the walk; May 2008) and Ardipithecus ramidus. Unfortunately, an intact Sahelanthropus cranium showing a foramen magnum – where the skull attaches to the spine – continues to elude field workers. Its position distinguishes upright gait definitively.

See also: This ancient fossil could rewrite the story of human origins.  Science Daily, January 3, 2026)

The second new advance concerns the joint ancestry of Neanderthals, Denisovans and anatomically modern humans (AMH), whose ancient genetics crudely suggest a last common ancestor living between 765 to 550 ka. This had previously been attributed to Homo antecessor found in the Gran Dolina cave at Atapuerca in northern Spain, roughly dated between 950 ka and 770 ka. (Incidentally, Gran Dolina has yielded plausible evidence of cannibalism). A novel possibility stems from hominin fossils excavated from a cave in raised-beach sediments near Casablanca in Morocco (Hublin, JJ. and 28 others, 2026  Early hominins from Morocco basal to the Homo sapiens lineage. Nature, v. 649 ; DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09914-y). The fossil-bearing sediments contain evidence for a shift in the Earth’s magnetic field (the Brunhes–Matuyama reversal) dated at 773 ka, much more precisely than the Atapuerca age span for H. antecessor. Jean-Jacques Hublin of CNRS in Paris and his multinational colleagues report that the fossils are similar in age to H. antecessor, yet are morphologically distinct, displaying a combination of primitive traits and of ‘derived features reminiscent of’ later Neanderthal, Denisovan and AMH fossils. The differences and shared features suggest that there may have been genetic exchanges between the Moroccan and Iberian population over a considerable period. The most obvious route would have been across the Straits of Gibraltar, but would have required some kind of water craft.  An important question is ‘which population gave rise to the other?’

Artistic reconstruction of a juvenile Homo antecessor, Based on skeletal remains from Gran Dolina Cave

Larger and more robust hominin remains in Algeria dated at 1,000 ka – H. heidelbergensis? – resemble those found near Casablanca. They may have evolved to the latter. Similar possible progenitors to Iberian Homo antecessor have yet to be found in Western Europe. Homo erectus appeared in Georgia and Romania between 2.0 and 1.9 Ma, but the intervening million years or more have yielded no credible European forebears of H. antecessor. For the moment, incursion of a North African population into Europe followed by sustained contact is Hublin et al’s favoured hypothesis, rather than a European origin for Homo antecessor. For Neanderthals and Denisovans to have originated from such an African group, as has been suggested, requires finds of African fossils with plausible resemblance to what are predominantly Eurasian groups. The Iberian population migrated far and wide in Western Europe, as witnessed by stone tools and footprints dating to between 950 to 850 ka in eastern England. So it is equally possible that the Iberian group were progenitors of Neanderthals and Denisovans in Eurasia itself. At least for the moment, ancient genomes of the two H. antecessor groups are unlikely to be found in either Iberian or African fossils of the same antiquity. But, as usual, that will not stifle debate: a resort to the adage ‘absence of evidence is not evidence of absence’ seems appropriate to several research teams!

The oldest anatomically modern human fossils dated at ~300 ka, were also discovered in Morocco (see: Origin of anatomically modern humans, June 2017). Their isolation in the NW corner of the African continent poses a similar conundrum, as since then such beings went on to occupy wide areas of sub-Saharan Africa and then the world.

Evidence for geologically aware Neanderthals using sparks to light fires

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

As early as 3.4 Ma bones with cut marks first appear in Ethiopia suggesting that meat had by then entered the hominin diet. Access to such a rich source of protein has been suggested to have encouraged the evolution of larger hominin brains. By around2.4 Ma ago it may have led to the first known human species (Homo habilis) with a brain larger than those of australopithecines. Homo ergaster, with a significantly larger brain size, first appeared at about 1.8 Ma. As the probable inventor of bifacial stone tools and being the first hominin to leave Africa, H. ergaster needed greater cognitive abilities.It is quite likely that discovery of means to cook food then provided a further boost to human evolution. Cooking unfolds the proteins in meat and also breaks down the constituents of raw vegetables making both more palatable and easier to digest. Also, many potentially nutritious tubers are toxic if not processed and cooked. Another evolutionary advantage is that such an increased uptake of nutrients without needing an increase in successful hunting and foraging reduces the length of the ‘working day’. Fire itself provides warmth, protection from large predators and light, which further increases the time available for social and mental activities.

Being able to cook demands the controlled use of fire. But when was fire first harnessed? After 3 Ma the climate in East Africa cooled to open up dry savannah, prone to wildfires. Finding naturally roasted carcases may have been an incentive for hominins to use smouldering patches to cook meat. The next breakthrough would have been carrying embers to light fires elsewhere. The earliest tentative evidence for such a fire was discovered at Swartkrans in South Africa. Crudely dated between 2 to 1 Ma, it was a reddened patch of soil containing charred, cut marked bones and burnt biface tools. Definite evidence only appears with the burnt teeth of large carp-like fish from a 780 ka site found at Gesher Benot Ya’aqob in Israel. So, archaeological evidence for cooking is very rare. Imagine, then, the excitement of a group of archaeologists from the British Museum and the Natural History Museum in London and several universities in the UK and Netherlands at finding a small, 400 ka-old Neanderthal hearth at Barham in Kent, England containing direct evidence of how the fire was lit (Davis, R. and 14 others 2025. Earliest evidence of making fire. Nature, online advance publication. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09855-6). Apparently, there are signs that fires had been lit at the hearth on twelve or more occasions. So, clearly, the spot was used regularly by Neanderthals.

Striking sparks with flint and pyrite. Credit: Craig Williams, The Trustees of the British Museum

The burnt-earth site yielded fire-cracked flint hand axes and fragments of the mineral pyrite (FeS2). Pyrite, named from the Greek word for ‘fire’ – i.e. ‘fire stone’ – creates showers of sparks when scraped with a hard, sharp tool. Struck into dry grass tinder the sparks cause it to smoulder and then burst into flame when blown on. This approach has been used throughout historic times. Interestingly, pyrite is not found in local rocks and had to have been brought from outcrops of Cretaceous Chalk 15 km away, which is also a major source of flint for stone tools. Not only had the Neanderthal ‘campers’ mastered this fire lighting method, they knew where to get the minerals required. With these skills, they could have lit fires on demand wherever they were; to cook, keep warm, light the night and keep predators at bay. The find is a lucky one, for pyrite eventually oxidises in damp air. The skill may have been acquired long before 400 ka. Yet, as most school children used to know, you can also produce fire, or at least embers and smoke(!), by abrading softwood (a schoolroom desk top) with hardwood (a wooden ruler) … Other abrasive methods are available, but none so handy as a flint-pyrite tinderbox.

See also: Smith, K.N. 2025. Getting lit: This is the oldest evidence of people starting fires. Ars Technica; 10 December 2025

The hand of Paranthropus boisei

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

One of the longest-lived hominin species that we know of was Paranthropus boisei, remains of which occur in East African sediments between 2.6 and 1.3 Ma. Others, including our own species, lasted nowhere near as long, except perhaps for Homo erectus who emerged around 1.9 Ma ago and is believed by some to have lingered on in Java until about 112 ka ago. However, when the unresolved muddle in the Middle Pleistocene of similar-looking hominin fossils is eventually unravelled – as now seems to be on the cards – that may limit the range of H. erectus to 1.9 -1.0 Ma. Paranthropoid remains are easily distinguished from those of their contemporary hominins – australopithecines and early species of Homo – being extremely robust compared with the ‘gracile’ members of the human line. They were also bipedal, but their fossil skulls are distinctive: massive teeth and jaws, and a bone crest on top of the cranium to which very powerful chewing muscles were attached. Once regarded as a sort of upright gorilla with vegetarian habits, evidence has accumulated since their first discovery that they may have been far more remarkable.

Reconstruction of a Paranthropus head (Credit: Jerry Humphrey, Pinterest)

The earliest paranthropoid was P. aethiopicus from Ethiopia, dated at around 2.7 to 2.3 Ma, and believed to be the common ancestor of P. boisei and P. robustus found in Tanzania and South Africa respectively. Stone and bone tools associated with paranthropoid remains have been found in South and East Africa, some of which show signs of having been burnt. The connection between paranthropoids and both tool- and fire-making is clearly impossible to verify with certainty, and so too for their known association with australopithecine remains – or even the earliest known humans (Homo habilis) for that matter. Palaeoanthropologists are not likely to find a near-complete skeleton of any of these candidates with a tool grasped in the remains of a hand! The issue can be partly resolved if it can be shown that a fossil hand was capable of making and using tools. The fabled ‘opposable thumb’ that is capable of touching the tips of all four fingers is essential for the necessary ‘precision grip’. Isolated, 2 Ma-old thumb bones probably able to do that were found in the famous Swartkrans Cave in South Africa, but with no clue as to which hominin species had yielded them. In fact had that matter been resolved there and then, it would be not take the hominin story very far, simply because evidence for tool use – tools and cut marks on bone – goes back as far as 3.3 Ma, again with more than one candidate for the usefully endowed hominin species.

The left hand of Paranthropus boisei reconstructed from individual bones, palm-up on the left, palm down on the right. Credit: Mongle et al, Fig 3.

Remarkably, a group of scientists from the US, Canada, Australia, South Africa and Kenya have indeed unearthed from 1.5 Ma sediments on the shore of Lake Turkana in Kenya a near-complete left hand associated with cranial bones and teeth from Paranthropus boisei  (Mongle,C.S. and 29 others 2025. New fossils reveal the hand of Paranthropus boisei. Nature v. 647, p. 944–951; DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09594-8). It is clear that the P. boisei hand shared some of the manipulative capacity of modern human hands, though it bears some resemblance to gorilla hands. That hand was probably nimble enough to make and use simple stone tools. It would also have had a powerful grip, sufficient for climbing and wielding a large stick. Yet again, it does not indicate which species first adopted tool making and use.

There are several interesting possibilities. It may be that a form of convergent evolution enabled two separate genera to become capable of such skills and the intellect to put them to use: tools, however simple, confer enormous evolutionary advantages. Had the antecedents of humans – presumably a species of Australopithecus – been the first, paranthropoids may have observed and adopted tools or vice versa. Just as possible, the – as yet unknown – common ancestor of both may have made this fundamental leap, which would have benefitted both vegetarian and omnivorous descendants. In that case the physiology of each group may have diverged with their lifestyles. Eating roots and leaves requires considerably more physical effort than getting sufficient protein and fats partly by devouring flesh.

A possible Chinese ancestor for Denisovans, Neanderthals and modern humans

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

Assigning human fossils older than around 250 ka to different groups of the genus Homo depends entirely on their physical features. That is because ancient DNA has yet to be found and analysed from specimens older than that. The phylogeny of older human remains is also generally restricted to the bones that make up their heads; 21 that are fixed together in the skull and face, plus the moveable lower jaw or mandible. Far more teeth than crania have been discovered and considerable weight is given to differences in human dentition. Teeth are not bones, but they are much more durable, having no fibrous structure and vary a great deal. The main problem for palaeoanthropologists is that living humans are very diverse in their cranial characteristics, and so it is reasonable to infer that all ancient human groups were characterised by such polymorphism, and may have overlapped in their physical appearance. A measure of this is that assigning fossils to anatomically modern humans, i.e. Homo sapiens, relies to a large extent on whether or not their lower mandible juts out to define a chin. All earlier hominins and indeed all other living apes might be regarded as ‘chinless wonders’! This pejorative term suggests dim-wittedness to most people, and anthropologists have had to inure themselves to such crude cultural conjecture.

The extraction, sequencing and comparison of ancient DNA from human fossils since 2010 has revealed that three distinct human species coexisted and interbred in Eurasia. Several well preserved examples of ancient Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans (AMH) have had their DNA sequenced, but a Denisovan genome has only emerged from a few bone fragments from the Denisova Cave in western Siberia. Whereas Neanderthals have well-known robust physical characters, until 2025 palaeoanthropologists had little idea of what Denisovans may have looked like. Then proteins and, most importantly, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) were extracted from a very robust skull found around 1931 in Harbin, China, dated at 146 ka. Analysis of the mtDNA and proteins, from dental plaque and bone respectively, reveal that the Harbin skull is likely to be that of a Denisovan. Previously it had been referred to as Homo longi, or ‘Dragon Man’, along with several other very robust Chinese skulls of a variety of ages.

The distorted Yunxian cranium (right) and its reconstruction (middle) [Credit: Guanghui Zhao] compared with the Harbin Denisovan cranium (left) [Hebei Geo University]

The sparse genetic data have been used to suggest the times when the three different coexisting groups diverged. DNA in Y chromosomes from Denisovans and Neanderthals suggest that the two lineages split from a common ancestor around 700 ka ago, whereas Neanderthals and modern humans diverged genetically at about 370 ka. Yet the presence of sections of DNA from both archaic groups in living humans and the discovery that a female Neanderthal from Denisova cave had a Neanderthal mother and a Denisovan father reveals that all three were interfertile when they met and interacted. Such admixture events clearly have implications for earlier humans. There are signs of at least 6 coexisting groups as far back as the Middle Pleistocene (781 to 126 ka), referred to by some as the ‘muddle in the middle’ because such an association has increasingly mystified palaeoanthropologists. A million-year-old, cranium found near Yunxian in Hubei Province, China, distorted by the pressure of sediments in which it was buried, has been digitally reconstructed.

This reconstruction encouraged a team of Chinese scientists, together with Chris Stringer of the UK Museum of Natural History, to undertake a complex statistical study of the Yunxian cranium. Their method compares it with anatomical data for all members of the genus Homo from Eurasia and Africa, i.e. as far back as the 2.4 Ma old H. habilis (Xiabo Feng and 12 others 2025. The phylogenetic position of the Yunxian cranium elucidates the origin of Homo longi and the Denisovans. Science, v. 389, p. 1320-1324; DOI: 10.1126/science.ado9202). The study has produced a plausible framework that suggests that the five large-brained humans known from 800 ka ago – Homo erectus (Asian), H. heidelbergensis, H. longi (Denisovans), H. sapiens, and H. neanderthalensis – began diverging from one another more than a million years ago. The authors regard the Yuxian specimen as an early participant in that evolutionary process. The fact that at least some remained interfertile long after the divergence began suggests that it was part of the earlier human evolutionary process. It is also possible that the repeated morphological divergence may stem from genetic drift. That process involves small populations with limited genetic diversity that are separated from other groups, perhaps by near-extinction in a population bottleneck or as a result of the founder effect when a small group splits from a larger population during migration. The global population of early humans was inevitably very low, and migrations would dilute and fragment each group’s gene pool.

The earliest evidence for migration of humans out of Africa emerged from the discovery of five 1.8 Ma old crania of H. erectus at Dmanisi to the east of the Black Sea in Georgia. similar archaic crania have been found in eastern Eurasia, especially China, at various localities with Early- to Middle Pleistocene dates. The earliest European large-brained humans – 1.2 to 0.8 Ma old H. antecessor from northern Spain – must have migrated a huge distance from either Africa or from eastern Eurasia and may have been a product of the divergence-convergence evolutionary framework suggested by Xiabo Feng and colleagues. Such a framework implies that even earlier members of what became the longi, heidelbergensis, neanderthalensis, and sapiens lineages may await either recognition or discovery elsewhere. But the whole issue raises questions about the widely held view that Homo sapiens first appeared 300 ka ago in North Africa and then populated the rest of that continent. Was that specimen a migrant from Eurasia or from elsewhere in Africa? The model suggested by Xiabo Feng and colleagues is already attracting controversy, but that is nothing new among palaeoanthropologists. Yet it is based on cutting edge phylogeny derived from physical characteristics of hominin fossils: the traditional approach by all palaeobiologists. Such disputes cannot be resolved without ancient DNA or protein assemblages. But neither is a completely hopeless task, for Siberian mammoth teeth have yielded DNA as old as 1.2 Ma and the record is held by genetic material recovered from sediments in Greenland that are up to 2.1 Ma old. The chances of pushing ancient human DNA studies back to the ‘muddle’ in the Middle Pleistocene depend on finding human fossils at high latitudes in sediments of past glacial maxima or very old permafrost, for DNA degrades more rapidly as environmental temperature rises.

See also: Natural History Museum press release. Analysis of reconstructed ancient skull pushes back our origins by 400,000 years to more than one million years ago. 25 September 2025; Bower, B. 2025. An ancient Chinese skull might change how we see our human roots. ScienceNews, 25 September 2025; Ghosh, P. 2025. Million-year-old skull rewrites human evolution, scientists claim. The Guardian, 25 September 2025

Earliest hominin occupation of Sulawesi and crossing of an ocean barrier

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

Regular readers of Earth-logs will recall that the islands of Indonesia were reached by the archaic humans Homo erectus and H. floresiensis at least a million years ago. Anatomical comparison of their remains suggest that the diminutive H. floresiensis probably evolved from H. erectus under the stress of being stranded on the small, resource-poor island of Flores: a human example of island dwarfism. In fact there are anatomically modern humans (AMH) living on Flores that seem to have evolved dwarfism in the same way since AMH first arrived there between 50 and 5 ka. Incidentally, H. erectus fossils and artefacts were found by Eugene Dubois in the late 19th century at a famous site near Trinil in Java. In 2014, turned out that H. erectus had produced the earliest known art – zig-zag patterns on freshwater clam shells – between 540 and 430 ka ago. The episodic falls in global sea level due to massive accumulations of ice on land during successive Pleistocene glacial episodes aided migration by producing connections between the islands of SE Asia. They created a huge area of low-lying dryland known as ‘Sundaland’. The islands’ colonisation by H. erectus was made easy, perhaps inevitable.

The interconnection of SE Asian islands to form Sundaland (yellow) when sea level was 120 m lower than today. Even at that extreme the island of Sulawesi remained isolated by deep ocean water. Credit: based on Hakim et al Fig 1.

However, Flores and islands further east are separated from those to the west by a narrow but very deep strait. It channels powerful currents that are hazardous to small-boat crossings even today. Most palaeoanthropologists consider the colonisation of Flores by H. erectus most likely to have resulted by accident, reckoning that they were incapable of planning a crossing and building suitable craft. For AMH to have reached New Guinea and Australia around 60 ka ago, they must have developed sturdy craft and sea-faring skills. This paradigm suggests that the evolution of AMH, and thus their eventual occupation of all continents except Antarctica, must have involved a revolutionary ‘leap’ in their cognitive ability just before they left Africa. That view has been popularised by the presenter (Ella Al-Shamahi) of the 2025 BBC Television series Human – now on BBC iPlayer (requires viewers to create a free account) – in its second episode Into the Unknown. [The idea of a cognitive leap that ushered in the almost worldwide migration of anatomically modern humans was launched in 1995 by controversial anthropologist Chris Knight of University College London].

Flaked artefact, about the length of a human thumb, made of chert from excavations at Calio on Sulawesi, dated at 1.02 Ma. Credit: based on Hakim et al Fig 2

The large and peculiarly-shaped island of Sulawesi, also part of Indonesia, is notable for being the location of the earliest known figurative art; a cave painting of a Sulawesi warty pig, dated to at least 45.5 ka ago. Indonesian and Australian archaeologists working at a site near Calio in northern Sulawesi unearthed stone artefacts deep in river-terrace gravels that contain fossils of extinct pigs and dwarf elephants (Hakim, B. and 26 others 2025. Hominins on Sulawesi during the Early Pleistocene. Nature, v. 644;DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09348-6). The tools were struck from pebbles of hard fine-grained rocks by flaking to produce sharp edges. A combination of dating techniques – palaeomagnetism, uranium-series and electron-spin resonance – on the terrace sediments and fossils in them yielded ages ranging from 1.04 to 1.48 Ma; far older than the earliest known presence of AMH on the island (73–63 ka). The dates for an early human presence on Sulawesi tally with those from Flores. The tool makers were probably H. erectus. To reach the island from Sundaland at a time when global sea level was 120 m lower than at present would have required crossing more than 50 km of open water. It seems unlikely that such a journey could have been accidental. The migrants would have needed seaworthy craft; possibly rafts. Clearly the AMH crossings to New Guinea around 60 thousand years ago would have been far more daunting. Both land masses would have been below the horizon of any point of departure from the Indonesian archipelago, even with island ‘hopping’. Yet the Sulawesi discovery, combined with the plethora of islands both large and small, suggests that the earlier non-AMH inhabitants of Indonesia potentially could have spread further at times of very low sea level.

See also: Brumm, A. t al. 2025. This stone tool is over 1 million years old. How did its maker get to Sulawesi without a boat? The Conversation, 6 August 2025

Evolution of pigmentation in anatomically modern humans of Europe: a new paradigm?

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

The colours of human skin, eyes and hair in living people across the world are determined by variants of genes (alleles) found at the same place on a chromosome. Since chromosomes are inherited from both mother and father, an individual may have the same two alleles (homozygous), or one of each (heterozygous). A dominant allele is always expressed, even if a single copy is present. A recessive allele is only expressed if the individual inherits two copies of it. Most characteristics of individuals result from the interaction of multiple genes, rather than a single gene. A commonly cited example is the coloration of eyes. If we had a single gene for eye colour – that of the iris – that had alleles just for blue (recessive or ‘b’) and one for brown (dominant or ‘B) pigmentation, brown-eyed individuals would have one or two ‘B’ alleles (bB or BB), whereas those with blue eyes would have to have two ‘blue’ alleles (bb). But inheritance is more complicated than that: there are people with green, hazel or grey eyes and even left- and right eyes of different colour. Such examples suggest that there are more than two genes affecting human eye colour, and each must have evolved as a result of mutations. Much the same goes for hair and skin coloration.

A group of scientists from the University of Ferrara in Italy have analysed highly detailed ancient DNA in anatomically modern human remains from Russia (Palaeolithic), Sweden (Mesolithic) and Croatia (Neolithic) to tease out the complexities of pigmentation inheritance. Then they applied a statistical approach learned from that study to predict the likely skin-, eye- and hair pigmentation in 348 less detailed genomes of ancient individuals whose remains date back to 45 Ma ( Silvia Perretti et al, 2025. Inference of human pigmentation from ancient DNA by genotype likelihood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, v. 122, article e2502158122; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2502158122).

An artist’s impression of a Mesolithic woman from southern Denmark (credit: Tom Bjorklund)

All the hunter-gatherer Palaeolithic individuals (12 samples between 45 and 13 ka old) bar one, showed clear signs of dark pigmentation in skin, eyes and hair – the outlier from Russia was probably lighter. Those from the Mesolithic (14 to 4 ka) showed that 11 out of 35 had a light eye colour (Northern Europe, France, and Serbia), but most retained the dark skin and hair expected in descendants of migrants from Africa. Only one 12 ka hunter-gatherer from Sweden had inferred blue eyes, blonde hair, and light skin.  The retention of dark pigmentation by European hunter-gatherers who migrated there from Africa has been noted before, using DNA from Mesolithic human remains and in one case from birch resin chewed by a Mesolithic woman. This called into question the hypothesis that high levels of melatonin in skin, which protects indigenous people in Africa from cancers, would result in their producing insufficient vitamin D for good health. That notion supposed that out-of-Africa migrants would quickly evolve paler skin coloration at higher latitudes. It is now known that diets rich in meat, nuts and fungi – staple for hunter-gatherers – provide sufficient vitamin-D for health at high latitudes. A more recent hypothesis is that pale skins may have evolved only after the widespread Neolithic adoption of farming when people came to rely on a diet dominated by cereals that are a poor source of vitamin-D.

However, 132 Neolithic farmers (10 to 4 ka ago) individuals studied by Perretti et al. showed increased diversity in pigmentation, with more frequent light skin tones, yet dark individuals persisted, particularly in southern and eastern Europe. Hair and eye colour showed considerable variability, the earliest sign of red hair showing up in Turkey. Even Copper- and Bronze Age samples ( 113 from 7 to 3 ka) and those from Iron Age Europeans (25 from 3 to 1.7 ka ago) still indicate common retention of dark skin, eyes and hair, although the proportion of lighter pigmentation increased in some regions of Europe. Other analyses of ancient DNA have shown that the Palaeo- and Mesolithic populations of Europe were quickly outnumbered by influx of early farmers, probably from the Anatolian region of modern Turkey, during the Neolithic. The farming lifestyle seems likely to have allowed the numbers of those who practised it to rise beyond the natural environment’s ‘carrying capacity’ for hunter-gatherers. The former inhabitants of Europe may simply have been genetically absorbed within the growing population of farmers. Much the same absorption of earlier groups seems to have happened with the westward migration from the Ukrainian and Russia steppes of the Yamnaya people and culture, culminating in the start of the European Bronze Age that reached western Europe around 2.1 ka, The Yamnaya introduced metal culture, horse-drawn wheeled vehicles and possibly Indo-European language.

So the novel probabilistic approach to ancient DNA by Perretti et al. also casts doubt on the diet-based evolution of light pigmentation at high latitudes. Instead, pulses of large population movements and thus changes in European population genetics probably account for the persistence of abundant evidence for dark pigmentation throughout Europe until historic times. The ‘lightening’ of Europeans’ physiognomy seems to have been vastly more complex than previously believed. Early Europe seems to have been almost bewilderingly diverse, which make a complete mockery of modern chauvinism and racism. The present European genetic ‘melting pot’ is surprisingly similar to that of Europe’s ancient past.

Chinese skull confirmed as Denisovan

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

For over a century Chinese scientists have been puzzling over ancient human skulls that show pronounced brow ridges. Some assigned them to Homo, others to species that they believe were unique to China. A widely held view in China was that people now living there evolved directly from them, adhering to the ‘Multiregional Evolution’ hypothesis as opposed to that of ‘Out of Africa’. However, the issue might now have been resolved. In the last few years palaeoanthropologists have begun to suspect that these fossilised crania may have been Denisovans, but none had been subject to genetic and proteomic analysis. The few from Siberia and Tibet that initially proved the existence of Denisovans were very small: just a finger bone and teeth.  Out of the blue, teeth in a robust hominin mandible dredged from the Penghu Channel between Taiwan and China yielded protein sequences that matched proteomic data from Denisovan fossils in Denisova Cave and Baishiya Cave in Tibet, suggesting that Denisovans were big and roamed  widely in East Asia. In 2021 a near-complete robust cranium came to light that had been found in the 1930s near Harbin in China and hidden – at the time the area was under Japanese military occupation. It emerged only when its finder revealed its location in 2018, shortly before his death. It was provisionally called Homo longi or ‘Dragon Man’. Qiaomei Fu of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in Beijing and her colleagues have made a comprehensive study of the fossil.

The cranium found near Harbin, China belonged to a Denisovan. Credit: Hebei Geo University

It is at least 146 ka old, probably too young to have been H. erectus, but predates the earliest anatomically modern humans to have reached East Asia from Africa (~60 ka ago). The Chinese scientists have developed protein- and DNA extraction techniques akin to those pioneered at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. It proved impossible to extract sufficient ancient nuclear DNA from the cranium bone for definitive genomic data to be extracted, but dental plaque (calculus) adhering around the only surviving molar in the upper jaw did yield mitochondrial DNA. The mtDNA matched that found in Siberian Denisovan remains (Qiaomei Fu et al. 2025. Denisovan mitochondrial DNA from dental calculus of the >146,000-year-old Harbin cranium. Cell, v. 188, p. 1–8; DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.05.040). The bone did yield 92 proteins and 122 single amino acid polymorphisms, as well as more than 20 thousand peptides (Qiaomei Fu and 8 others 2025. The proteome of the late Middle Pleistocene Harbin individual. Science, v. 388: DOI: 10.1126/science.adu9677). Again, these established a molecular link with the already known Denisovans, specifically with one of the Denisova Cave specimens. Without the painstaking research of the Chinese team, Denisovans would have been merely a genome and a proteome without much sign of a body! From the massive skull it is clear that they were indeed big people with brains much the same size as those of living people. Estimates based on the Harbin cranium suggest an individual weighing around 100 kg (220 lb or ~15 stone): a real heavyweight or rugby prop!

The work of Qiaomei Fu and her colleagues, plus the earlier, more limited studies by Tsutaya et al., opens a new phase in palaeoanthropology. Denisovans now have a genome and well-preserved parts of an entire head, which may allow the plethora of ancient skulls from China to be anatomically assigned to the species. Moreover, by extracting DNA from dental plaque for the first time they have opened a new route to obtaining genomic material: dental calculus is very much tougher and less porous than bone.

See also: Curry, A. ‘Dragon Man’ skull belongs to mysterious human relative. 2025. Science, v. 388; DOI: 10.1126/science.z8sb68w. Smith K. 2025. We’ve had a Denisovan skull since the 1930s – only nobody knew. Ars Technica, 18 June 2025. Marshall, M. 2025. We finally know what the face of a Denisovan looked like. New Scientist 18 June 2025.