Judging by the coverage in the media, there is huge excitement about a possible sign of life on a very distant planet. It emerged from a Letter to The Astrophysical Journal posted by a British-US team of astronomers led by Nikku Madhusudhan that was publicised by the Cambridge University Press Office (Madhusudhan, N.et al. 2025. New Constraints on DMS and DMDS in the Atmosphere of K2-18 b from JWST MIRI. The Astrophysical Journal, v. 983, article adc1c8; DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc1c8). K2-18 b is a planet a bit smaller than Neptune that orbits a red dwarf star (K2-18) about 124 light years away. The planet was discovered by NASA’s now-defunct Kepler space telescope tasked with the search for planets orbiting other stars. An infrared spectrometer on the Hubble Space Telescope revealed in 2019 that the atmosphere of K2-18 b contained water vapour, making the planet a target for further study as it may possess oceans. The more sophisticated James Webb Space Telescope IR spectrometer was trained on it a year later to reveal methane and CO2: yet more reason to investigate more deeply, for water and carbon compounds imply both habitability and the potential for life forms being there.
The latest results suggest that that the atmosphere of K2-18 b may contain simple carbon-sulfur gases: dimethyl sulfide ((CH3)2S) and dimethyl disulfide (CH3SSCH3). Bingo! for exobiologists, because on Earth both DMS and DMDS are only produced by algae and bacteria. Indeed they are responsible for the odour of the seaside. They became prominent in 1987 when biogeochemist James Lovelock fitted them into his Gaia Hypothesis. He recognised that they encourage cloud formation and thus increase Earth’s reflectivity (albedo) and also yield sulfuric acid aerosols in the stratosphere when they oxidise: that too increases albedo. DMS generates a cooling feedback loop to counter the warming feedback of greenhouse emissions. That is an idea of planetary self-regulation not much mentioned nowadays. Such gases were proposed by Carl Sagan as unique molecular indicators that could be used to search for extraterrestrial life.
The coma of Comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko yielded both dimethyl sulfide and amino acids to the mass spectrometer carried by ESA’s Rosetta. Credit: ESA.
The discovery of possible DMS and DMDS in K2-18 b’s atmosphere is, of course, currently under intense scientific scrutiny. For a start, the statistics inherent in Madhusudhan et al.’s methodology (3σ or 99.7% probability) fall short of the ‘gold standard’ for discoveries in physics (5σ or 99.99999% probability). Moreover, there’s also a chance that exotic, inorganic chemical processes could also create the gases, such as lightning in an atmosphere containing C, H and S. But this is not the first time that DMS has been discovered in an extraterrestrial body. Comets, having formed in the infancy of the Solar System much further from the Sun than any planets, are unlikely to be ‘teeming with life’. The European Space Agency’s Rosetta spacecraft chased comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko for 2 years, directly sampling dust and gas that it shed while moving closer to the Sun. A single day’s data from Rosetta’s mass spectrometer showed up DMS, and also amino acids. Both could have formed in comets or interstellar dust clouds by chemistry driven by radiation, possibly to contaminate planetary atmospheres. Almost certainly, further remote sensing of K2-18 b will end up with five-sigma precision and some will say, ‘Yes, there is life beyond Earth!’ and celebrate wildly. But that does not constitute proof, even by the ‘weight of evidence’ criterion of some judiciaries. To me such a conclusion would be unseemly romanticism. Yet such is the vastness of the material universe and the sheer abundance of the elements C H O N and P that make up most living matter that life elsewhere, indeed everywhere, (but not life as we know it) is a near certainty. The issue of intelligent lifeforms ‘out there’ is, however, somewhat less likely to be resolved . . .
The surface of Venus from the USSR Venera 14 lander
It is often said that Earth has a twin: Venus, the second planet from the Sun. That isn’t true, despite the fact that both have similar size and density. Venus, in fact, is even more inhospitable that either Mars or the Moon, having surface temperatures (~465°C) that are high enough to melt lead or, more graphically, those in a pizza oven. The only vehicles successfully to have landed on Venus (the Russian Venera series) survived for a mere 2 hours, but some did did send back data and images. That near incandescence is masked by the Venusian atmosphere that comprises 96.5% carbon dioxide, 3.5% nitrogen and 0.05 % sulfur dioxide, with mere traces of other gases including extremely low amounts of water vapour (0.002%) and virtually no oxygen. The dense atmosphere imposes a pressure at Venus’s surface tht is 92 times that on Earth: so dense that CO2 and N2 are, strictly speaking, not gases but supercritical fluids at the surface. At present Venus is definitely inimical to any known type of life. It is the victim of an extreme, runaway greenhouse effect.
As it stands, Venus’s geology is also very different from that of the Earth. Because its upper atmosphere contains clouds of highly reflective sulfuric acid aerosols only radar is capable of penetrating to the surface and returning to have been monitored by a couple of orbital vehicles: Magellan (NASA 1990 to 1994) and Venus Express (European Space Agency 2006 to 2014). The latter also carried means of mapping Venus’s surface gravitational field. The radar imagery shows that 80% of the Venusian surface comprises somewhat wrinkled plains that suggests a purely volcanic origin. Indeed more that 85,000 volcanoes have been mapped, 167 of which are over 100 km across. Much of the surface appears to have been broken into polygonal blocks or ‘campuses’ (campus is Latin for field) that give the impression of ‘crazy paving’. A peculiar kind of local-scale tectonics has operated there, but nothing like the plate tectonics on Earth in either shape or scale.
Polygonal blocks or ‘campuses’ on the lowland surface of Venus. Note the zones of ridges that roughly parallel ‘campus’ margins. Credit: Paul K. Byrne, North Carolina State University and Sean C. Solomon, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Many of the rocky bodies of the solar system are pocked by impact craters – the Earth has few, simply because erosion and sedimentary burial on the continents, and subduction of ocean floors have removed them from view. The Venusian surface has so few that it can, in its entirety, be surmised to have formed by magmatic ‘repaving’ since about 500 Ma ago at least. Earlier geological process can only be guessed at, or modelled in some way. A recent paper postulates that ‘there are several lines of evidence that suggest that Venus once did have a mobile lithosphere perhaps not dissimilar to Earth …’ (Weller, M.B. & Kiefer, W.S. 2025. The punctuated evolution of the Venusian atmosphere from a transition in mantle convective style and volcanic outgassing. Science Advances, v. 11, article eadn986; DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn986). One large, but subtle feature may have formed by convergence similar to that of collision tectonics. There are also gravitational features that hint at active subduction at depth, although the surface no longer shows connected features such as trenches and island arcs. Local extension has been inferred from other data.
Weller and Kiefer suspect that Venus in the past may have shifted between a form of mobile plate tectonics and stagnant ‘lid’ tectonics, the vast volcanic plains having formed by processes akin to flood volcanism on a planetary scale. Venus’s similar density to that of Earth suggests that it is made of similar rocky material surrounding a metallic core. However, that planet has a far weaker magnetic field suggesting that the core is unable to convect and behave like a dynamo to generate a magnetic field. That may explain why the atmosphere of Venus is almost completely dry. With no magnetic field to deflect it the solar wind of charged particles directly impacts the upper atmosphere, in contrast to the Earth where only a very small proportion descends at the poles. Together with the action of UV solar radiation that splits water vapour into its constituent hydrogen and oxygen ions, the solar wind adds energy to them so that they escape to space. This atmospheric ‘erosion’ has steadily stripped the atmosphere of Venus – and thus its solid surface – of all but a minute trace of water, leaving behind higher mass molecules, particularly carbon dioxide, emitted by its volcanism. Of course, this process has vastly amplified the greenhouse effect that makes Venus so hot. Early on the planet may have had oceans and even primitive life, which on Earth extract CO2 by precipitating carbonates and by photosynthesis, respectively. But they no longer exist.
The high surface temperature on Venus has made its internal geothermal gradient very different from Earth’s; i.e. increasing from 465°C with depth, instead of from about 15°C on Earth. As a result, everywhere beneath the surface of Venus its mantle has been more able to melt and generate magma. Earlier in its history it may have behaved more like Earth, but eventually flipped to continual magmatic ‘repaving’. To investigate how this evolution may have occurred Weller and Kiefer created 3-D spherical models of geological activity, beginning with Earth-like tectonics – a reasonable starting point because of the probable Earth-like geochemistry of Venus. My simplified impression of what they found is that the periodic blurting of magma well-known from Earth history to have created flood-basalt events without disturbing plate tectonics proceeded on Venus with progressively greater violence. Such events here emitted massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere over short (~1 Ma) time scales and resulted in climate change, but Earth’s surface processes have always returned to ‘normal’. Flood-basalt episodes here have had a rough periodicity of around 35 Ma. Weller and Kiefer’s modelling seems to suggest that such events on Venus may have been larger. Repetition of such events, which emitted CO2 that surface processes could not erase before the next event, would progressively ramp up surface temperatures and the geothermal gradient. Eventually climatic heating would drive water from the surface into the atmosphere, to be lost forever through interaction with the solar wind. Without rainfall made acid by dissolved CO2, rock weathering that tempers the greenhouse effect on Earth would cease on Venus. The increased geothermal gradient would change any earlier rigid, Earth-like lithosphere to more ductile material, thereby shutting down the formation of plates, the essence of tectonics on Earth. It may have been something along those lines that made Venus inimical to life, and some may fear that anthropogenic global warming here might similarly doom the Earth to become an incandescent and sterile crucible orbiting the Sun. But as Mark Twain observed in 1897 after reading The New York Herald’s account that he was ill and possibly dying in London, ‘The report of my death was an exaggeration’. It would suit my narrative better had he said ‘… was premature’!
The Earth has a very large Moon because of a stupendous collision with a Mars-sized planet shortly after it accreted. That fundamentally reset Earth’s bulk geochemistry: a sort of Year Zero event. It endowed both bodies with magma oceans from which several tectonic scenarios developed on Earth from Eon to Eon. There is no evidence that Venus had such a catastrophic beginning. By at least 3.7 billion years ago Earth had a strong magnetic field. Protected by that thereafter from the solar wind, it has never lost its huge endowment of water; solid, liquid or gaseous. It seems that it did go through a stagnant lid style of tectonics early on, that transitioned to plate tectonics around the end of the Hadean Eon (~4.0 Ga), with a few hiccups during the Archaean Eon. And it did develop life as an integral part of the rock cycle. Venus, fascinating as it is, shows no sign of either, and that’s hardly surprising. Those factors and its being much closer to the Sun may have condemned it from the outset.
A fully revised edition of Steve Drury’s book Stepping Stones: The Making of Our Home World can now be downloaded as a free eBook
In March 1989 an asteroid half a kilometre across passed within 500 km of the Earth at a speed of 20 km s-1. Making some assumptions about its density, the kinetic energy of this near miss would have been around 4 x 1019 J: a million times more than Earth’s annual heat production and humanity’s annual energy use; and about half the power of detonating every thermonuclear device ever assembled. Had that small asteroid struck the Earth all this energy would have been delivered in a variety of forms to the Earth System in little more than a second – the time it would take to pass through the atmosphere. The founder of “astrogeology” and NASA’s principal geological advisor for the Apollo programme, the late Eugene Shoemaker, likened the scenario to a ‘small hill falling out of the sky’. (Read a summary of what would happen during such an asteroid strike). But that would have been dwarfed by the 10 to 15 km impactor that resulted in the ~200 km wide Chicxulub crater and the K-Pg mass extinction 66 Ma ago. Evidence has been assembled for Earth having been struck during the Archaean around 3.6 billion years (Ga) ago by an asteroid 200 to 500 times larger: more like four Mount Everests ‘falling out of the sky’ (Drabon, N. et al. 2024. Effect of a giant meteorite impact on Paleoarchean surface environments and life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 121, article e2408721121; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2408721121
Impact debris layer in the Palaeoarchaean Barberton greenstone belt of South Africa, which contains altered glass spherules and fragments of older carbonaceous cherts. (Credit: Credit: Drabon, N. et al., Appendix Fig S2B)
In fact the Palaeoarchaean Era (3600 to 3200 Ma) was a time of multiple large impacts. Yet their recognition stems not from tangible craters but strata that contain once glassy spherules, condensed from vaporised rock, interbedded with sediments of Palaeoarchaean ‘greenstone belts’ in Australia and South Africa (see: Evidence builds for major impacts in Early Archaean; August 2002, and Impacts in the early Archaean; April 2014), some of which contain unearthly proportions of different chromium isotopes (see: Chromium isotopes and Archaean impacts; March 2003). Compared with the global few millimetres of spherules at the K-Pg boundary, the Barberton greenstone belt contains eight such beds up to 1.3 m thick in its 3.6 to 3.3 Ga stratigraphy. The thickest of these beds (S2) formed by an impact at around 3.26 Ga by an asteroid estimated to have had a mass 50 to 200 times that of the K-Pg impactor.
Above the S2 bed are carbonaceous cherts that contain carbon-isotope evidence of a boom in single-celled organisms with a metabolism that depended on iron and phosphorus rather than sunlight. The authors suggest that the tsunami triggered by impact would have stirred up soluble iron-2 from the deep ocean and washed in phosphorus from the exposed land surface, perhaps some having been delivered by the asteroid itself. No doubt such a huge impact would have veiled the Palaeoarchaean Earth with dust that reduced sunlight for years: inimical for photosynthesising bacteria but unlikely to pose a threat to chemo-autotrophs. An unusual feature of the S2 spherule bed is that it is capped by a layer of altered crystals whose shapes suggest they were originally sodium bicarbonate and calcium carbonate. They may represent flash-evaporation of up to tens of metres of ocean water as a result of the impact. Carbonates are less soluble than salt and more likely to crystallise during rapid evaporation of the ocean surface than would NaCl.
Time line of possible events following a huge asteroid impact during the Palaeoarchaean. (Credit: Drabon, N. et al. Fig 8)
So it appears that early extraterrestrial bombardment in the early Archaean had the opposite effect to the Chicxulub impactor that devastated the highly evolved life of the late Mesozoic. Many repeats of such chaos during the Palaeoarchaean could well have given a major boost to some forms of early, chemo-autotrophic life, while destroying or setting back evolutionary attempts at photo-autotrophy.
Michael Rampino and Ken Caldeira of New York University and the Carnegie Institute have for at least three decades been at the forefront of studies into mass extinctions and their possible causes, including flood-basalt volcanism, extraterrestrial impacts and climate change. As early as 1993 the duo reported an ubiquitous 26-million year cycle in plate tectonic and volcanic activity. In Rampino’s 2017 book Cataclysms: A New Geology for the Twenty-First Century the notion of a process similar to Milutin Milankovich’s prediction of Earth’s orbital characteristics underpinning climate cyclicity figured in his thinking (see Shock and Er … wait a minute, Earth-logs, October 2017). Rampino postulated then that this longer-term geological cyclicity could be linked to gravitational changes during the Solar System’s progress around the Milky Way galaxy. He was by no means the first to turn to galactic forces, Johann Steiner having made a similar suggestion in 1966. The notion stems from the Solar System’s wobbling path as it orbits the centre of the Milky Way galaxy about every 250 Ma, which may result in its passage through a vast layered variation in several physical properties aligned at right angles to galactic orbital motions. This grand astronomical theory is ‘a story that will run and run’; and it has. It is possible that the galaxy has corralled dark matter in a disc within the galactic plane, which Rampino and Caldeira latched onto that notion a year after it appeared in Physical Review Letters in 2014.
Map of the Milky Way galaxy as it would appear from a viewpoint above the galactic centre. The Solar System is located in the Orion Spur (green dot) (Credit: Wikipedia)
As I commented in my brief review of Rampino’s book: “As for Rampino’s galactic hypothesis, the statistics are decidedly dodgy, but chasing down more forensics is definitely on the cards.” Indeed they have been chased in a recent review by the pair and their colleague Sedelia Rodriguez (Rampino, M.R., Caldeira, K. & Rodriguez, S. 2023. Cycles of ∼32.5 My and ∼26.2 My in correlated episodes of continental flood basalts (CFBs), hyper-thermal climate pulses, anoxic oceans, and mass extinctions over the last 260 My: Connections between geological and astronomical cycles. Earth-Science Reviews, v. 246 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104548; reprint available on request from Rampino). They base their amplified case on much more than radiometric dates of continental flood basalt (CFB) events matched against the stratigraphic record of biotic diversity. Among the proxies are published measurements of mercury and osmium isotope anomalies in oceanic sediments that are best explained by sudden increases in basaltic magma eruption; signs of deep ocean anoxia; new dating of marine and non-marine extinctions in the fossil record, and episodes of sudden extreme climatic heating.
Statistical analysis of the ages of anoxic events and marine extinctions has yielded cycles of 32.5 and 26.2 Ma, those for CFBs having a 32.8 Ma periodicity. A note of caution, however: their data only cover the last 266 Ma – about one orbit of the solar system around the galactic centre. The authors attribute their interpretation of the cycles “to the Earth’s tectonic-volcanic rhythms, but the similarities with known Milankovitch Earth orbital periods and their amplitude modulations, and with known Galactic cycles, suggest that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the geological events and cycles may be paced by astronomical factors”.
Whether or not a detailed record of appropriate proxies can be extended back beyond the Late Permian, remains to be seen. The main fly-in-the-ointment is the tendency of CFB provinces to form high ground so that they are readily eroded away. Pre-Mesozoic signs of their former presence lie in basaltic dyke swarms that cut through older crystalline continental crust. The marine sedimentary record is somewhat better preserved. A search for distinctive anomalies in osmium isotopes and mercury concentrations, which are useful proxies for global productivity of basaltic magmas, will be costly. Moreover, dating will depend to a large degree on the traditional palaeontology of strata, which in Palaeozoic rocks is more difficult to calibrate precisely by absolute radiometric dating.
Earth-logs 