Signs of massive hydrocarbon burning at the end of the Triassic

One of the ‘Big Five’ mass extinctions occurred at the end of the Triassic Period (~201 Ma), whose magnitude matches that of the more famous end-Cretaceous (K-Pg) event. It roughly coincided with the beginning of break-up of the Pangaea supercontinent that was accompanied by a major episode of volcanism preserved in the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP). Eastern North America, West Africa and northern South America reveal scattered patches of CAMP flood basalts, swarms of dykes and large intrusive sills. Like all mass extinctions, that at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary left a huge selection of vacant or depleted ecological niches ready for evolution to fill by later adaptive radiation of surviving organisms. Because it coincided with continental break-up and drift, unlike other such events, evolution proceeded in different ways on the various wandering land masses and in newly formed seas (see  an excellent animation of the formation and break-up of Pangaea – move the slider to 3 minutes for the start of break-up). The Jurassic was a period of explosive evolution among all groups of organisms. The most notable changes were among marine cephalopods, to give rise to a bewildering variety of ammonite species, and on land with the appearance and subsequent diversification of dinosaurs.

Pangaea at the end of the Triassic (top) and in Middle Cretaceous times (Credit: screen shots from animation by Christopher Scotese)

Many scientists have ascribed the origin of these events to the CAMP magmatic activity and the release of huge amounts of methane to trigger rapid global warming. In October 2021 one group focused on a special role for the high percentages of magma that never reached the surface and formed huge intrusions that spread laterally in thick sedimentary sequences to ‘crack’ hydrocarbons to their simplest form, CH4 or methane. A sedimentary origin of the methane, rather than its escape from the mantle, is indicated by the carbon-isotope ‘signature’ of sediments deposited shortly after the Tr-J event. The lighter isotope 12C rose significantly relative to 13C, suggesting an organic source – photosynthesis selectively takes up the lighter isotope.

By examining the element mercury (Hg) in deep ocean sediments from a Tr-J sedimentary section now exposed in Japan, scientists from China, the US and Norway have added detail to the methane-release hypothesis (Shen, J et al. 2022. Mercury evidence for combustion of organic-rich sediments during the end-Triassic crisis. Nature Communications, v. 13, article 1307; DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-28891-8). The relative proportions of Hg isotopes strongly suggest that the mercury had been released, as was the methane, from organic-rich sediments rather than from the CAMP magmas (i.e. ultimately from the mantle) through gasification and then burning at the surface.

The hypothesis is enlivened by a separate study (Fox C.P. et al. 2022. Flame out! End-Triassic mass extinction polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons reflect more than just fire. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 584, article 117418; DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117418) that sees magmatic heating as being not so important. Calum Fox and colleagues at Curtin University, Western Australia analysed sediments from a Triassic-Jurassic sedimentary sequence near the Severn Bridge in SW England, focusing on polycyclic hydrocarbons in them. Their results show little sign of the kinds of organic chemical remnants of modern wildfires. Instead they suggest a greater contribution from soil erosion by acid rain that increased input of plant debris to a late Triassic marine basin

See also: How a major volcanic eruption paved the way for the rise of the dinosaurs Eureka Alert 23 March 2022;  Soil erosion and wildfire: another nail in coffin for Triassic era. Science Daily, 21 March 2022

Fossil fuel, mercury and the end-Palaeozoic catastrophe

Siberian flood-basalt flows in the Putorana Plateau, Taymyr Peninsula, Russia. (Credit: Paul Wignall)

The end of the Permian Period (~252 Ma ago) saw the loss of 90% of marine fossil species and 70% of those known from terrestrial sediments: the greatest known extinction in Earth’s history. In their naming of newly discovered life forms, palaeontologists can become quite lyrical. Extinctions, however, really stretch their imagination. They call the Permo-Triassic boundary event ‘The Great Dying’. Why not ‘Permageddon’? Sadly, that was snaffled in the 1980s by an astonishingly short-haired heavy-metal tribute band. Enough bathos … The close of the Palaeozoic left a great many ecological niches to be filled by adaptive radiation during the Triassic and later Mesozoic times. Coinciding with the largest known flood-basalt outpouring – the three million cubic kilometres of Siberian Traps – the P-Tr event seemed to be ‘done and dusted’ after that possible connection was discovered in the mid 1990s. Notwithstanding, the quest for a gigantic, causative impact crater continues (see: Palaeobiology Earth-logs, May, September and October 2004), albeit among a dwindling circle of enthusiasts. The Siberian Traps are suitably vast to snuff the fossil record, for their eruption must have belched all manner of climate-changing gases and dusts into the atmosphere; CO2 to encourage global warming; SO2 and dusts as cooling agents. There is also evidence of a role for geochemical toxicity (see: Nickel, life and the end-Permian extinction, June 2014). The extinctions accompanied not only climate change but also a catastrophic fall in atmospheric oxygen content (see: Homing in on the great end-Permian extinction, April 2003; When rain kick-started evolution, December 2019). Recovery of the biosphere during the early Triassic was exceedingly slow.

Research focussed on the P-Tr boundary eventually uncovered an element of pure chance. Shales in Canada that span the boundary show major, negative δ13C excursions in the carbon-isotope record that coincide with fly ash in the analysed layers. This material is similar in all respects to that emitted from coal-fired power stations (see: Coal and the end-Permian mass extinction, March 2011). The part of Siberia onto which the flood basalts were erupted is rich in Permian coal measures and oil shales that lay close to the surface 252 Ma ago. The coal ash and massive emissions of CO2 may have resulted from their burning by the flood basalt event. Now evidence has emerged that this did indeed happen (Elkins-Tanton, L.T. et al. 2020. Field evidence for coal combustion links the 252 Ma Siberian Traps with global carbon disruption. Geology, v. 48, early publication; DOI: 10.1130/G47365.1).

The US, Canadian and Russian team found large quantities of burnt coal and woody material, and bituminous blobs in 600 m thick volcanic ashes at the base of the Siberian traps themselves. They concluded that the magma chamber from which the flood basalts emerged had incorporated sizeable volumes of the coal measures, leading to their combustion and distillation. This would have released CO2 enriched in light 12C due to isotopic fractionation by biological means, i.e. its δ13C would have been sufficiently negative to affect the carbon locked up in the Canadian P-Tr boundary-layer shales that show the sharp isotopic anomalies. The magnitude of the anomalies suggest that between six to ten thousand billion tons of carbon released as CO2 or methane by interaction of the Siberian Traps with sediments through which their magma passed could have created the global δ13C anomalies. That is about one tenth of the organic carbon originally locked in the Permian coal measures beneath the flood basalts

Another paper whose publication coincided with that by Elkins-Tanton et al. suggests that environmental mercury appears to have followed the same geochemical course as did carbon at the end of the Palaeozoic Era (Dal Corso, J. and 9 others 2020. Permo–Triassic boundary carbon and mercury cycling linked to terrestrial ecosystem collapse. Nature Communications, v. 11, paper 2962; DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16725-4). This group, based at Leeds and Oxford Universities, UK and the University of Geosciences in Wuhan, China, base their findings on biogeochemical modelling of the global carbon and mercury cycles at the end of the Permian. Their view is that the coincidence in marine sediments at the P-Tr boundary of a short-lived spike in mercury and an anomaly in its isotopic composition with the depletion in 13C, described earlier, shows an intimate link between mercury and the biological carbon cycle in the oceans at the time. They suggest that this synergy marks ecosystem collapse and derives ‘from a massive oxidation of terrestrial biomass’; i.e. burning of organic material on the land surface. Their modelling hints at huge wildfires in equatorial peatlands but also a role for the Siberian flood-basalt volcanism and the incorporation of coal measures into the Siberian Trap magma chamber.

The late-Ordovician mass extinction: volcanic connections

The dominant feature of Phanerozoic stratigraphy is surely the way that many of the formally named major time boundaries in the Stratigraphic Column coincide with sudden shifts in the abundance and diversity of fossil organisms. That is hardly surprising since all the globally recognised boundaries between Eras, Periods and lesser divisions in relative time were, and remain, based on palaeontology. Two boundaries between Eras – the Palaeozoic-Mesozoic (Permian-Triassic) at 252 Ma and Mesozoic-Cenozoic (Cretaceous-Palaeogene) at 66 Ma – and a boundary between Periods – Triassic-Jurassic at 201 Ma – coincide with enormous declines in biological diversity. They are defined by mass extinctions involving the loss of up to 95 % of all species living immediately before the events. Two other extinction events that match up to such awesome statistics do not define commensurately important stratigraphic boundaries. The Frasnian Stage of the late-Devonian closed at 372 Ma with a prolonged series of extinctions (~20 Ma) that eliminated  at least 70% of all species that were alive before it happened. The last 10 Ma of the Ordovician period witnessed two extinction events that snuffed out about the same number of species. The Cambrian Period is marked by 3 separate events that in percentage terms look even more extreme than those at the end of the Ordovician, but there are a great many less genera known from Cambrian times than formed fossils during the Ordovician.

Faunal extinctions during the Phanerozoic in relation to the Stratigraphic Column.

Empirical coincidences between the precise timing of several mass extinctions with that of large igneous events – mainly flood basalts – suggest a repeated volcanic connection with deterioration of conditions for life. That is the case for four of the Famous Five, the end-Ordovician die-off having been ascribed to other causes; global cooling that resulted in south-polar glaciation of the Gondwana supercontinent and/or an extra-solar gamma-ray burst (predicated on the preferential extinction of Ordovician near-surface, planktonic fauna such as some trilobite families). Neither explanation is entirely satisfactory, but new evidence has emerged that may support a volcanic trigger (Jones, D.S. et al. 2017. A volcanic trigger for the Late Ordovician mass extinction? Mercury data from south China and Laurentia. Geology, v. 45, p. 631-634; doi:10.1130/G38940.1). David Jones and his US-Japan colleagues base their hypothesis on several very strong mercury concentrations in thin sequences in the western US and southern China of late Ordovician marine sediments that precede, but do not exactly coincide with, extinction pulses. They ascribe these to large igneous events that had global effects, on the basis of similar Hg anomalies associated with extinction-related LIPs. Yet no such volcanic provinces have been recorded from that time-range of the Ordovician, although rift-related volcanism of roughly that age has been reported from Korea. That does not rule out the possibility as LIPs, such as the Ontong Java Plateau, are known from parts of the modern ocean floor that formed in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Ordovician ocean floor was subducted long ago.

The earlier Hg pulses coincide with evidence for late Ordovician glaciations over what is now Africa and eastern South America. The authors suggest that massive volcanism may then have increased the Earth’s albedo by blasting sulfates into the stratosphere. A similar effect may have resulted from chemical weathering of widely exposed flood basalts which draws down atmospheric CO2. The later pulses coincide with the end of Gondwanan glaciation, which may signify massive emanation of volcanic CO2 into the atmosphere and global warming. Despite being somewhat speculative, in the absence of evidence, a common link between the Big Five plus several other major extinctions and LIP volcanism would quieten their popular association with major asteroid and/or comet impacts currently being reinvigorated by drilling results from the K-Pg Chicxulub crater offshore of Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula.

Planet Mercury and giant collisions

Full-color image of from first MESSENGER flyby
Mercury’s sun-lit side from first MESSENGER flyby (credit: Wikipedia)

Mercury is quite different from the other three Terrestrial Planets, having a significantly higher density. So it must have a considerably larger metallic core than the others – estimated to make up about 70% of Mercury’s mass – and therefore has a far thinner silicate mantle. The other large body in the Inner Solar System, our Moon, is the opposite, having the greatest proportion of silicate mantle and a small core.

The presently favoured explanation for the Moon’s anomalous mass distribution is that it resulted from a giant collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetary body. Moreover, planetary theorists have been postulating around 20 planetary ‘embryos’ in the most of which accreted to form Venus and Earth, the final terrestrial event being the Moon-forming collision, with smaller Mars and Mercury having been derived from the two remaining such bodies. For Mercury to have such an anomalously large metallic core has invited mega-collision as a possible cause, but with such a high energy that much of its original complement of silicate mantle failed to fall back after the event. Two planetary scientists from the Universities of Arizona, USA, and Berne, Switzerland, have modelled various scenarios for such an origin of the Sun’s closest companion (Asphaug, E. & Reuffer, A. 2014. Mercury and other iron-rich planetary bodies as relics of inefficient accretion. Nature Geoscience, published online, doi: 10.1038/NGEO2189).

Their favoured mechanism is what they term ‘hit-and-run’ collisions in the early Inner Solar System. In the case of Mercury, that may have been with a larger target planet that survived intact while proto-Mercury was blasted apart to lose much of it mantle on re-accretion. To survive eventual accretion into a larger planet the left-overs had to have ended up in an orbit that avoided further collisions. Maybe Mars had the same kind of lucky escape but one that left it with a greater proportion of silicates.

One possible scenario is that proto-Mercury was indeed the body that started the clock of the Earth-Moon system through a giant impact. Yet no-one will be satisfied with a simulation and some statistics. Only detailed geochemistry of returned samples can take us any further. The supposed Martian meteorites seem not to be compatible with such a model; at least one would expect there to have been a considerable stir in planetary-science circles if they were. For Mercury, it will be a long wait for a resolution by geochemists, probably yet to be conceived.

Mercury: sometimes a moist, organic-rich world

Full-color image of from first MESSENGER flyby
Full-colour image of Mercury from MESSENGER  (credit: NASA via Wikipedia)

Astronomers welcomed in 2013 by suggesting from Kepler spacecraft data that the Milky Way galaxy alone probably hosts at least a hundred billion extrasolar planets and that a potentially habitable world the size of Earth probably lies within 20 light years of ours ( OK, so there are at least 10-15 planets out there for every person likely to be alive by the mid-21 century when the technology becomes available to judge whether or not any of them hold a shred of interest for a population facing worsening living conditions right here.

Mercury is closer and currently being peered at in considerable detail by NASA’s MESSENGER mission to the Sun’s closest planet. The venture seems to have justified itself – and probably JAXA/ESA’s forthcoming BepiColumbo to be launched in 2015, arriving in 2022 – by showing that the long suspected ‘cold traps’ at Mercury’s poles have indeed trapped something: ice and abundant organic debris (Neuman, G.A . and 10 others 2013. Bright and dark polar deposits on Mercury: evidence for surface volatiles. Science, v. 339, p. 296-300).

The planet is exceeding rough, having been hit by objects of all sizes yet possessing insufficient internal energy to repave itself. Its axis of rotation is at a right angles to Mercury’s orbital plane, much like that of the Moon, so its polar regions are perpetually short of solar radiation. Deeply shadows places have been measured by infrared radiometry to be as cold as 25 degrees above absolute zero. Any volatile materials that might have landed in them or condensed there from earlier atmospheres might seem likely to stay there indefinitely. Not quite so, for the most likely compound, water ice, can sublimate away (shift directly from the solid to vapour state). Nevertheless, remote sensing shows the north pole region to be somewhat mottled dark and light on shadowed poleward-facing surfaces. The properties of backscattered radar beams and detection of emitted neutrons are consistent with the bright areas being water ice (Lawrence, D.J. and 12 others 2013. Evidence for water ice near Mercury’s north pole from MESSENGER neutron spectrometer measurements. Science, v. 339, p. 292-296). First estimates give a total ice volume of around 10 to 1000 km3 compared with almost 3 million km3 in the Greenland ice cap.

It’s the dark stuff that sets Mercury apart from, say, the Martian or lunar poles, the idea being that comets or icy asteroids impacting Mercury would have delivered complex organic compounds as well as water ice. This would temporarily give otherwise airless Mercury an atmosphere of volatiles parts of which might condense in the perpetually shaded parts of the polar region. Sublimation of exposed ice would have left a residue rich in those organic compounds that eventually protected deeper ice from fading away with time.

Now, imagine how supremely excited exo-planet hunters would be if they picked up such signals from a truly far-off world.

Mercury: anything new?

Full color image of from first MESSENGER flyby
Mercury from an earlier MESSENGER fly-by. Image via Wikipedia

The Sun’s nearest planet, Mercury, seems odd in some ways; for instance, it has a proportionately larger metallic core than any other planet. That feature has led some to suggest that somehow most of any original silicate mantle was lost. One possibility is that its proximity to the Sun resulted in Mercury’s surface being ablated. Another looks to a huge collision with another body that tore off much of the mantle; similar to the event that the chemical commonality of the Earth and Moon suggests early in Earth history. Both processes should have left a distinct geochemical signature on the surface of Mercury: some kind of residue of solar ablation or evidence of fractional crystallisation of a magma ocean, such as the feldspar-rich lunar highlands that are probably formed of crystals that floated as such a planetary silicate melt cooled and evolved. The seeming strangeness of Mercury helped underpin a well-equipped un-crewed mission, going by the acronym MESSENGER, that finally settled into Mercury orbit in March 2011 after a planned ‘yo-yoing’ path since launch in August 2004 that took it back and forth between Earth, Mercury and Venus in its early stages. Early analysis of results from the now permanent orbit appeared in the 30 September 2011 issue of Science.

MESSENGER carries several remote sensing instruments: a stereo imaging device to map landforms, and topography; a laser altimeter to back the stereo imager; a visible to short-wave infrared spectrometer to map variations in surface spectra and minerals; gamma-ray spectrometry to map distributions of naturally radioactive isotopes and emissions from other elements triggered by high-energy cosmic ray bombardment; using the Sun as a source of gamma- and X-rays to cause a variety of elements to emit lower energy X-rays – a variant of X-ray fluorescence spectrometry that is a workhorse of lab geochemistry.

The earlier Mercury fly-bys and previous missions clearly showed that its surface is heavily cratered but possesses areas resurfaced by lavas that obliterate older cratering. A little like the lunar maria in age and appearance, these smooth terrains show evidence of accumulations up to a kilometre thick formed by repeated lava flows (Head, J.W. and 25 others, 2011. Flood volcanism in the northern high latitudes of Mercury revealed by MESSENGER. Science, v. 333, p. 1853-1855). As regards the age of these major volcanic features, all that can be said is that they post-date the largest impacts, such as the huge Caloris Basin, and are more sparsely peppered with younger craters. Intriguingly, floors of some of the craters show clusters of small depressions and pits surrounded by light-coloured material of some kind, suggested to be solids condensed from gases that emerged from below (Blewett, D.T. and 17 others 2011. Hollows on Mercury: MESSENGER evidence for geologically recent volatile-related activity. Science, v. 333, p. 1856-1859). While it is only possible to assign youth of these features relative to the craters in which they occur, they indicate an underlying source of volatiles; a factor weighing against previous accounts of Mercury’s evolution by either solar ablation or giant impact.

Considerably more interesting – at least to me – are the results from the geochemically oriented instruments. Calcium, magnesium, aluminium and silicon estimates by the XRF-like instrument present not the slightest evidence for a feldspar-rich component of the early crust akin to the lunar highlands; another blow for the giant-impact and magma-ocean hypotheses. Mercury’s surface seems to be similar in composition to the most ancient terrestrial lavas: Mg-rich mafic to ultramafic komatiites, compared with the more iron-rich tholeiites of the lunar maria (Nittler, L.R. and 14 others. The major-element composition of Mercury’s surface from Messenger X-ray spectrometry. Science, v. 333, p. 1847-1850). They are ten-times more enriched in sulfur than surface rocks on the Earth or Moon, though iron content seems too low to accommodate it in minerals such as pyrite (FeS2). High sulfur content could point to an origin for Mercury from accretion of highly reduced material in the solar nebula, the Earth-Moon system being broadly more oxidised. Gamma-ray spectrometry to analyse the abundances of potassium, uranium and thorium (Peplowski, P.N. and 16 others. Radioactive elements on Mercury’s surface from MESSENGER: implications for the planet’s formation and evolution. Science, v. 333, p. 1850-1852) doesn’t serve previous ideas about the planet’s history either. Potassium, which is moderately volatile, is too high relative to more refractory uranium and thorium to support any notion of solar ablation of the surface, but the U, Th and K proportions are roughly like those of the Earth’s oceanic crust. One of the plots shows K-Th relationships for supposed meteorites from Mars and the extensive gamma-ray data from Mars itself, in which few of the meteorites fall in the K-Th ‘cloud’ for the Martian surface: now there’s a thing….

It must be emphasised that the geochemical results are but a fraction of what should eventually emerge from these powerful instruments. However, these early data place Mercury in much the same envelope as the other rock worlds of the Inner Solar System (Kerr, R.A. 2011. Mercury looking less exotic, more a member of the family. Science, v. 333, p. 1812).