Tag: UK

Impact debris in Neoproterozoic sediments of Scotland and biological evolution?

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment
False-colour electron microscope image of a shocked grain of zircon recovered from the Stac Fada Member. The red and pink material is a high-pressure polymorph of zircon, arranged in shock lamellae. Zircon is rendered in cyan, some of which is in granulated form. Credit: Kirkland et al. 2025, Fig 2C

Judging by its content of shards and spherules made of murky green glass, one of the lowest units in the Torridonian continental sediments of NW Scotland had long been regarded as simply red sandstone that contained volcanic debris. This Stac Fada Member was thus celebrated as the only sign of a volcanic contribution to a vast thickness (up to 2.5 km) of Neoproterozoic lake and fluviatile sediments. Current flow indicators suggested that the Torridonian was laid down by large alluvial fans derived by erosion of much older crystalline basement far to what is today the west. That is, the Archaean core of the ancient continent of Laurentia, now the other side of the North Atlantic. In 2002 more sophisticated sedimentological and geochemical analysis of the Stac Fada Member revealed a surprise: it contains anomalously elevated platinum-group elements, quartz grains that show signs of shock and otherworldly chromium isotope concentrations. The 10 m thick bed is made from ejecta, perhaps from a nearby impact crater to the WNW concluded from brittle fractures that may have been produced by the impact. Some idea of its age was suggested by Ar-Ar dating of feldspar crystals (~1200 Ma) believed to have formed authigenically in the hot debris. Being the only decent impactite known in Britain, it continues to attract attention.

A group of geoscientists from Western Australia, NASA and the UK, independent of the original discoverers, have now added new insights ( Kirkland, C.L. and 12 others 2025. A one-billion-year old Scottish meteorite impact. Geology, v. 53, early online publication; DOI: 10.1130/G53121.1). They dated shocked zircon grains using U-Pb analyses at 990 ± 22 Ma; some 200 Ma younger than the previously dated, authigenic feldspars.  Detrital feldspar grains in the Stac Fada Member yield Rb-Sr radiometric ages of 1735 and 1675, that are compatible with Palaeoproterozoic granites in the underlying Lewisian Gneiss Complex.

Photomicrograph of Bicellum brazieiri: scale bar = 10μm; arrows point to dark spots that may be cell nuclei (credit: Charles Wellman, Sheffield University)

In a separate publication (Kirkland, C.L et al 2025. 1 billion years ago, a meteorite struck Scotland and influenced life on Earth. The Conversation, 29 April 2025) three of the authors take things a little further, as their title suggests. In this Conversation piece they ponder, perhaps unwarily, on the spatial and temporal association of the indubitable impact with remarkably well-preserved spherical fossils found in Torridonian lake-bed sediments (Bicellum brasieri, reported in Earth-logs in May 2021), which are the earliest-known holozoan animal ancestors. The Torridonian phosphatic concretions in which these important fossils were found at a different locality are roughly 40 Ma younger than the Stac Fada impactite. The authors of the Conversation article appeal to the residual thermal effect of the impact as a possible driver for the appearance of these holozoan organisms. Whether a residual thermal anomaly would last long enough for them to evolve to this biological status would depend on the magnitude of the impact, of which we know nothing.  Eukaryote fossils are known from at least  650 Ma older sedimentary rocks in northern China and perhaps as far back as 2.2 Ga in a soil that formed in the Palaeoproterozoic of South Africa. Both the Torridonian organism and impactite were found in a small area of fascinating geology that has been studied continuously in minute detail since Victorian times, and visited by most living British geologists during their undergraduate days. Ideas will change as curiosity draws geologists and palaeobiologists to less-well studied sites of Proterozoic antiquity, quite possibly in northern China.

A fully revised edition of Steve Drury’s book Stepping Stones: The Making of Our Home World can now be downloaded as a free eBook

A certain shyness about research misconduct in the UK

Published on by zooks777Leave a comment

Since Earth Pages was launched at the start of the 21st century there have been highly publicised cases of gross misconduct by researchers, including plagiarism, ‘massaging ‘data and even sabotaging the work of others, as well as lesser cases where publications were withdrawn or removed from journals. The most notorious have been from the USA, Japan, the Netherlands and a number of other advanced countries. But sharp practices in science are not well known in the UK; indeed I can’t recollect more than one case that reached the same degree of coverage as the most notorious instances. Yet, in 2009, Daniele Fanelli of the University of Edinbugh reported the results of her analysis of accessible information from the UK about this matter. She found that about 2% of British scientists, who had been interviewed or answered questionnaires, answered ‘Yes’ when asked if they ever fabricated or falsified research data, or if they altered or modified results to improve the outcome. Up to one third admitted other questionable practices or knew of them having been committed by colleagues. Fanelli doesn’t refer to more grievous matters such as sabotage or exploitation of students’ work.

The silence from British Universities on research misconduct has become such an embarrassment that it was a subject of an Editorial and a News In Focus Report in the 21 May issue of Nature . While there are guidelines that urge British universities to publish annual reports of their investigations into misconduct, for 2013-14 only 12 such reports have been published : of the 88 universities contacted by the informal UK Research Integrity Office, 30 institutions responded to UKRIO’s survey. These reports covered 21 investigations, mostly unspecified, with 5 cases of plagiarism, 2 of falsification, 2 concerning authorship, 1 of fabrication and 1 breach of confidentiality. Three were upheld and 3 are pending.

These figures speak loudly for themselves: misconduct by researchers (and academics in general) is something that the halls of British academe ‘dinnae care to speak aboot’. As the author of UKRIO’s survey observed, ‘It’s just not credible’, although many of the universities that she contacted claim that such reports were in progress. A likely story… We all know that the ‘filthy snout’ (Tom Wolfe The Bonfire of the Vanities) does ‘come popping to the surface’, but is buried in confidentiality by university Research Committees, leaving any victims dangling in a sorry psychological state and allowing journals’ peer review system to catch any perpetrators before they reach the press, which it is rarely able to do. It takes a case as severe as that of Andrew Wakefield’s fraudulent 1998 paper in the Lancet associating the MMR vaccine with autism to see justice done.