
Meteor Crater, 60 km east of Flagstaff in Arizona, USA, is probably the most visited site of an impact by an extraterrestrial object. At 1.3 km across it isn’t especially big, but it is exceptionally well preserved, having formed a mere 55.6 ka ago. Apart from its shape its impact origin is proved by its rim, which shows overturning and inversion of strata that it penetrated. The 40 metre diameter nickel-iron object that did the damage arrived at a speed around 13 km s-1 and delivered kinetic energy equivalent to an explosion of 10 million tons of TNT. This was sufficient to vaporise the body, except for a few fragments. Impressive as that is, the impact was tiny compared with others known on Earth, such as the Chicxulub impact that ended the Mesozoic Era 60 Ma ago. Nevertheless, the surface blast would have sterilised an area up to 1000 km2 around the impact, i.e. up to 17 km in all directions. Yet, most of the impact energy would have affected the surrounding crust. It’s a place worth visiting.
The other must-see site in northern Arizona is the Grand Canyon, some 100 km north of Flagstaff by train, and about 320 km by road. Unlike Meteor Crater, whose origins were well established more than 50 years ago, the Grand Canyon still draws research teams to study the geology of the rock formations through which it cuts and the geomorphological processes that formed it. Several expeditions have examined caves high above the level of the Colorado River that has cut the Canyon since the start of the Pliocene Epoch, some 5 Ma ago. One objective of this research has been to document past flooding, due to the massive landslides and rock falls that must have occurred as cliffs became unstable during canyon formation. One cave – Stanton’s Cave – is 45 m above the present level of the Colorado: about the height of a 16 storey block of flats. The cave floor is made of well-bedded sand that contains driftwood logs, as do other caves along the canyon. Dating the logs from cave to cave should give at least an idea of the history of flooding and thus cliff collapses. In the case of Stanton’s Cave early radiocarbon dating yielded results close to the maximum that the rapid decay of 14C makes possible. Such dating at the limit of the technique is imprecise. The oldest existing radiocarbon age in this case is 43.5 ± 1.5 ka from a 1984 study. Since then, this dating technique has advanced considerably.

Karl Karlstrom – whose father was also entranced by cave deposits in the Grand Canyon in the 1960s – together with colleagues from the US managed to persuade radiocarbon specialists from Australia and New Zealand to improve the sediment dating (Karlstrom, K.E and 11 others 2025. Grand Canyon landslide-dam and paleolake triggered by the Meteor Crater impact at 56 ka. Geology, v. 53, online article; DOI: 10.1130/G53571.1). The new 14Cage of the logs is 55.25 ± 2.44 ka, confirmed by infrared stimulated luminescence (IRSL) dating of feldspar grains in the cave sand at 56.00 ± 6.39 ka Combined with a new cosmogenic nuclide exposure age of 56.00 ± 2.40 ka for the Meteor Crater ejecta the results are exciting. It looks as if the cliff fall that dammed the Colorado River to fill the cave with sediment coincided with the impact. Crater formation is estimated to have resulted in a seismic event of magnitude 5.4. In such a teetering terrain as the Grand Canyon cliffs, the impact-induced earthquake about 100 km away, even if attenuated to an effective magnitude estimated at 3.5 may have been sufficient to topple part of the cliffs. With cliffs that average 1.6 km high, such a collapse would have displaced sufficient debris to create a substantial barrier to flow of the Colorado River, which is tightly constrained between cliffs. The chaotic debris at the suggested dam site is now partly covered by round river cobbles, suggesting that it was soon overtopped, probably within a thousand years of the cliff collapse.
Because all the dates have substantial imprecision, it is not possible to claim that the authors have proved conclusively a direct connection between impact and cliff collapse. But neither do the age data disprove what is a plausible causal connection.
See also: UNM study finds link between Grand Canyon landslide and Meteor Crater impact. University of New Mexico News 15 July 2025















