Was Venus once habitable?

The surface of Venus from the USSR Venera 14 lander

It is often said that Earth has a twin: Venus, the second planet from the Sun. That isn’t true, despite the fact that both have similar size and density. Venus, in fact, is even more inhospitable that either Mars or the Moon, having surface temperatures (~465°C) that are high enough to melt lead or, more graphically, those in a pizza oven. The only vehicles successfully to have landed on Venus (the Russian Venera series) survived for a mere 2 hours, but some did did send back data and images. That near incandescence is masked by the Venusian atmosphere that comprises 96.5% carbon dioxide, 3.5% nitrogen and 0.05 % sulfur dioxide, with mere traces of other gases including extremely low amounts of water vapour (0.002%) and virtually no oxygen. The dense atmosphere imposes a pressure at Venus’s surface tht is 92 times that on Earth: so dense that CO2 and N2 are, strictly speaking, not gases but supercritical fluids at the surface. At present Venus is definitely inimical to any known type of life. It is the victim of an extreme, runaway greenhouse effect.

As it stands, Venus’s geology is also very different from that of the Earth. Because its upper atmosphere contains clouds of highly reflective sulfuric acid aerosols only radar is capable of penetrating to the surface and returning to have been monitored by a couple of orbital vehicles: Magellan (NASA 1990 to 1994) and Venus Express (European Space Agency 2006 to 2014). The latter also carried means of mapping Venus’s surface gravitational field. The radar imagery shows that 80% of the Venusian surface comprises somewhat wrinkled plains that suggests a purely volcanic origin. Indeed more that 85,000 volcanoes have been mapped, 167 of which are over 100 km across. Much of the surface appears to have been broken into polygonal blocks or ‘campuses’ (campus is Latin for field) that give the impression of ‘crazy paving’. A peculiar kind of local-scale tectonics has operated there, but nothing like the plate tectonics on Earth in either shape or scale.

Polygonal blocks or ‘campuses’ on the lowland surface of Venus. Note the zones of ridges that roughly parallel ‘campus’ margins. Credit: Paul K. Byrne, North Carolina State University and Sean C. Solomon, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

Many of the rocky bodies of the solar system are pocked by impact craters – the Earth has few, simply because erosion and sedimentary burial on the continents, and subduction of ocean floors have removed them from view. The Venusian surface has so few that it can, in its entirety, be surmised to have formed by magmatic ‘repaving’ since about 500 Ma ago at least. Earlier geological process can only be guessed at, or modelled in some way. A recent paper postulates that ‘there are several lines of evidence that suggest that Venus once did have a mobile lithosphere perhaps not dissimilar to Earth …’ (Weller, M.B. & Kiefer, W.S. 2025. The punctuated evolution of the Venusian atmosphere from a transition in mantle convective style and volcanic outgassing. Science Advances, v. 11, article eadn986; DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn986). One large, but subtle feature may have formed by convergence similar to that of collision tectonics. There are also gravitational features that hint at active subduction at depth, although the surface no longer shows connected features such as trenches and island arcs. Local extension has been inferred from other data.

Weller and Kiefer suspect that Venus in the past may have shifted between a form of mobile plate tectonics and stagnant ‘lid’ tectonics, the vast volcanic plains having formed by processes akin to flood volcanism on a planetary scale. Venus’s similar density to that of Earth suggests that it is made of similar rocky material surrounding a metallic core. However, that planet has a far weaker magnetic field suggesting that the core is unable to convect and behave like a dynamo to generate a magnetic field. That may explain why the atmosphere of Venus is almost completely dry. With no magnetic field to deflect it the solar wind of charged particles directly impacts the upper atmosphere, in contrast to the Earth where only a very small proportion descends at the poles. Together with the action of UV solar radiation that splits water vapour into its constituent hydrogen and oxygen ions, the solar wind adds energy to them so that they escape to space. This atmospheric ‘erosion’ has steadily stripped the atmosphere of Venus – and thus its solid surface – of all but a minute trace of water, leaving behind higher mass molecules, particularly carbon dioxide, emitted by its volcanism. Of course, this process has vastly amplified the greenhouse effect that makes Venus so hot. Early on the planet may have had oceans and even primitive life, which on Earth extract CO2 by precipitating carbonates and by photosynthesis, respectively. But they no longer exist.

The high surface temperature on Venus has made its internal geothermal gradient very different from Earth’s; i.e. increasing from 465°C with depth, instead of from about 15°C on Earth. As a result, everywhere beneath the surface of Venus its mantle has been more able to melt and generate magma. Earlier in its history it may have behaved more like Earth, but eventually flipped to continual magmatic ‘repaving’. To investigate how this evolution may have occurred Weller and Kiefer created 3-D spherical models of geological activity, beginning with Earth-like tectonics – a reasonable starting point because of the probable Earth-like geochemistry of Venus. My simplified impression of what they found is that the periodic blurting of magma well-known from Earth history to have created flood-basalt events without disturbing plate tectonics proceeded on Venus with progressively greater violence. Such events here emitted massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere over short (~1 Ma) time scales and resulted in climate change, but Earth’s surface processes have always returned to ‘normal’. Flood-basalt episodes here have had a rough periodicity of around 35 Ma. Weller and Kiefer’s modelling seems to suggest that such events on Venus may have been larger. Repetition of such events, which emitted CO­2 that surface processes could not erase before the next event, would progressively ramp up surface temperatures and the geothermal gradient.  Eventually climatic heating would drive water from the surface into the atmosphere, to be lost forever through interaction with the solar wind. Without rainfall made acid by dissolved CO2, rock weathering that tempers the greenhouse effect on Earth would cease on Venus. The increased geothermal gradient would change any earlier rigid, Earth-like lithosphere to more ductile material, thereby shutting down the formation of plates, the essence of tectonics on Earth. It may have been something along those lines that made Venus inimical to life, and some may fear that anthropogenic global warming here might similarly doom the Earth to become an incandescent and sterile crucible orbiting the Sun. But as Mark Twain observed in 1897 after reading The New York Herald’s account that he was ill and possibly dying in London, ‘The report of my death was an exaggeration’. It would suit my narrative better had he said ‘… was premature’!

The Earth has a very large Moon because of a stupendous collision with a Mars-sized planet shortly after it accreted. That fundamentally reset Earth’s bulk geochemistry: a sort of Year Zero event. It endowed both bodies with magma oceans from which several tectonic scenarios developed on Earth from Eon to Eon. There is no evidence that Venus had such a catastrophic beginning. By at least 3.7 billion years ago Earth had a strong magnetic field. Protected by that thereafter from the solar wind, it has never lost its huge endowment of water; solid, liquid or gaseous. It seems that it did go through a stagnant lid style of tectonics early on, that transitioned to plate tectonics around the end of the Hadean Eon (~4.0 Ga), with a few hiccups during the Archaean Eon. And it did develop life as an integral part of the rock cycle. Venus, fascinating as it is, shows no sign of either, and that’s hardly surprising. Those factors and its being much closer to the Sun may have condemned it from the outset.

A fully revised edition of Steve Drury’s book Stepping Stones: The Making of Our Home World can now be downloaded as a free eBook

News about when subduction began

Tangible signs of past subduction take the form of rocks whose mineralogy shows that they have been metamorphosed under conditions of high pressure and low temperature, and then returned to the surface somehow. Ocean-crust basaltic rocks become blueschist and eclogite. The latter is denser than mantle peridotite so that oceanic lithosphere can sink and be recycled. That provides the slab-pull force, which is the major driver of plate tectonics. Unfortunately, neither blueschists nor eclogites are found in metamorphic complexes older than about 800 Ma. This absence of direct proof of subduction and thus modern style plate tectonics has resulted in lively discussion and research seeking indirect evidence for when it did begin, the progress of which since 2000 you can follow through the index for annual logs about tectonics. An interesting new approach emerged in 2017 that sought a general theory for the evolution of silicate planets, which involves the concept of ‘lid tectonics’. A planet in a stagnant-lid phase has a lithosphere that is weak as a result of high temperatures: indeed so weak and warm that subduction was impossible. Stagnant-lid tectonics does not recycle crustal material back to its source in the mantle and it simply builds up the lithosphere. Once planetary heat production wanes below a threshold level that permits a rigid lithosphere, parts of the lid can be driven into the mantle. The beginnings of this mobile-lid phase and thus plate tectonics of some kind involves surface materials in mantle convection: the may be recycled.

Cartoon of possible Hadean stagnant lid tectonics, dominated by mantle plumes. (Credit: Bédard, J.H. 2018, Fig 3B, DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2017.01.005)

A group of geochemists from China, Canada and Australia have sought evidence for recycled crustal rocks from silicon and oxygen isotopes in the oldest large Archaean terrane, the  4.0 Ga old Acasta Gneiss Complex in northern Canada (Zhang, Q. and 10 others 2023. No evidence of supracrustal recycling in Si-O isotopes of Earth’s oldest rocks 4 Ga ago. Science Advances, v.9, article eadf0693; DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf0693). Silicon has three stable isotopes 28Si, 29Si, and 30Si. As happens with a number of elements, various geochemical processes are able to selectively change the relative proportions of such isotopes: a process known as isotope fractionation. As regards silicon isotopes used to chart lithosphere recycling, the basic steps are as follows: Organisms that now remove silicon from solution in seawater to form their hard parts and accumulate in death as fine sediments like flint had not evolved in the Archaean. Because of that reasonable supposition it has been suggested that seawater during the Archaean contained far more dissolved silicon than it does now. Such a rich source of Si would have entered Archaean oceanic crust and ocean-floor sediments to precipitate silica ‘cement’. The heaviest isotope 30Si would have left solution more easily than the lighter two. Should such silicified lithosphere have descended to depths in the mantle where it could partially melt the anomalously high 30Si would be transferred to the resulting magmas.

Proportions of 30Si in zircons, quartz and whole rock for Acasta gneisses (coloured), other Archaean areas (grey) and Jack Hills zircons (open circles. Vertical lines are error bars. (Credit: simplified from Zhang et al. Fig 1)

Stable-isotope analyses by Zhang et al. revealed that zircon and quartz grains and bulk rock samples from the Acasta gneisses, with undisturbed U-Pb ages, contain 30Si in about the same proportions relative to silicon’s other stable isotopes as do samples of the mantle. So it seems that the dominant trondhjemite-tonalite-granodiorite (TTG) rocks that make up the oldest Acasta gneisses were formed by partial melting of a source that did not contain rocks from the ocean crust. Yet the Acasta Gneiss Complex also contains younger granitic rocks (3.75 to 3.50 Ga) and they are significantly more enriched in 30Si, as expected from a deep source that contained formerly oceanic rocks. A similar ‘heavy’ silicon-isotope signature is also found in samples from other Archaean terranes that are less than 3.8 Ga old. Thus a major shift from stagnant-lid tectonics to the mobile-lid form may have occurred at the end of the Hadean. But apart from the Acasta Gneiss Complex only one other, much smaller Hadean terrane has been discovered, the 4.2 Ga Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt. It occupies a mere 20 km2 on the eastern shore of Hudson Bay in Canada, and appears to be a sample of Hadean oceanic crust. It does include TTG gneisses, but they are about 3.8 Ga old and contain isotopically heavy silicon. So it seems unlikely that testing this hypothesis with silicon-isotope data from other Hadean gneissic terranes will be possible for quite a while, if at all.