The finding of Tiktaalik, a supposed ‘missing link’ between bony fishes and amphibians (see A fish-quadruped missing link in EPN issue for May 2006) seemed to resolve the descent of tetrapods nicely. As is common, if inconvenient, nature has thrown a spanner in the works through a remarkable find in Polish rocks much older than those containing Tiktaalik and more evolved tetrapods (Niedźwiedski, G. et al. 2010. Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian period of Poland. Nature, v. 463, p. 43-48). Quarrymen unearthed extensive tracks appeared during excavation of intertidal limestones of the Middle Devonian Eifelian Stage (392-398 Ma). The bedding surface also shows raindrop pits and desiccation cracks, so the tracks were made by creatures able to survive out of water. The prints (up to 26 cm wide) are three times bigger than the paws of later amphibians that left fossil remains, but like them they show signs of more than 5 toes. The maker of one trackway was a good walker, having left no trace of dragging its belly through the mud, and it either had no tail or carried it aloft since there is no trail left by a tail either. Another, smaller animal left a separate trackway showing a very different gait. There seems little doubt that these animals were well advanced towards completely terrestrial lifestyles. Tiktaalik from 380 Ma sediments in Arctic Canada obviously cannot have been ancestral to them, and nor are there any fossils from the Middle Devonian that look like candidates. The hunt is on for fossilised remains of whatever walked the walk, and may emerge in the not-too-distant future from subtidal sediments of the same formation.
See also: Janvier, P. & Clément, G. 2010. Muddy tetrapod origins. Nature, v. 463, p. 40-41.
‘Roger, I think that triffid just moved’
The nasty surprise awaiting the bulk of human population blinded by radiation from a meteor shower in John Wyndham’s Day of the Triffids was that the genetically engineered, oil-yielding triffid plants could not only deal out deadly stings but they walked and ate dead meat. So it is that palaeontologists have found with the flabby, quilted bag-like organisms of the late Neoproterozoic Ediacaran fauna. They were animals of some kind, but hitherto considered to be completely sessile, except in larval form. They seem not to have been able to bite or gnaw, but probably absorbed victuals through their skins. Imagine the shock when palaeontologists from Oxford and Memorial University of Newfoundland found trackways in the famous biome of Mistaken Point in Newfoundland (Liu, A.G. et al. 2010. First evidencee for locomotion in the Ediacaran biota from the 565 Ma Mistaken Point Formation, Newfoundland. Geology, v. 38, p. 123-126). This throws an entirely new light on the very first sizeable animals: some of them were muscular. But not very adventurous, for the trails are only up to 17.2 cm long. Several of the traces show curved ridges, much like though far smaller than those left in wet sand by a buttock-shuffling baby, but ascribed by the authors to use of an ‘inflatable pedal disk’ in the manner of some cnidarians today – they ‘blurted’ along no doubt. The darned things must have had a purpose in moving, and chasing down prey springs easily to mind, only to be swiftly rejected. Alarmingly, at least for their totally torpid companions, some of the trackways clearly end in a depression: did they lie in wait? Yet not a one shows the telltale three-fold pedestal symmetry of Wyndham’s triffids…
Believable Archaean fossils
Some years back a major spat broke out over the reality of microscopic features purported to be evidence for bacterial life in 3.5 Ga rocks from Western Australia (See Doubt cast on earliest bacterial fossils in April 2002 issue of EPN), which has rumbled on ever since among highly regarded groups of palaeontologists. Those who refuted those finds as merely mineralogical structures that just seem to look biogenic have more work pending. Much more convincing evidence has been found in 3.2 Ga cherty rocks from South Africa (Javaux, E.J. et al. 2010. Organic-walled microfossils in 3.2-billion-year-old shallow marine siliciclastic deposits. Nature, v. 463, p. 934-938). They are big, by microfossil standards, 3-dimensional structures up to a third of a millimetre across, and clearly resemble cells. Some have even been separated from their matrices by dissolving away silica with hydrofluoric acid, so are not merely figments of the authors’ imagination. They are carbonaceous with very negative δ13C values typical of organically processed carbon and show abundant evidence of intricate structures found in living cells. Raman infrared spectroscopy also shows that they have been metamorphosed at the same grade as the rock that host them, so they cannot be later contaminants. In all these respects the little spherules are a cut above previously described structures reckoned to have been early Archaean life forms, convincingly taking concrete evidence for the existence of living things back a remarkable billion years: the previous oldest true fossils are about 2.2 billion years old.
In one respect the find may be truly breath taking. Spherules this size cannot be from the life-domain Archaea, and at the very least they are particularly large cells of Bacteria. Yet, bacterial cells contain little that could produce such robust little objects, which resemble single-celled eukaryotes known as acritarchs. The earliest definite acritarchs data back to 1.8 Ga. Geochemical evidence for eukaryotes was not sought in the spherules, but there has been speculation that some Archaean rocks have yielded chemical biomarkers that point to the presence of the ancestors of multicelled life at an astonishingly early date in Earth’s history. Clearly Javaux and colleagues work is a precursor of a lot more, now that we have hard-to-refute evidence for 3.2 Ga life.
A ginger dinosaur
The Early Cretaceous of SE China has become justifiably famous by providing a regular supply of superbly preserved small dinosaurs and early birds believed to have had a dinosaurian ancestry in the Jurassic. We have become accustomed to seeing computer generated graphics of brightly coloured dinosaurs since the BBC series Walking with Dinosaurs, first broadcast in 1999, but they owe more to imaginative assumptions based on strongly patterned living lizards than to fossil evidence. That is set to change, with the discovery of actual colouring agents in a Chinese find (Zhang et al. 2010. Fossilized melanosomes and the colour of Cretaceous dinosaurs and birds. Nature, v. 463, p. 1075-1078). The melanosomes are in exquisitely preserved feathers that adorned and probably warmed small dinosaurs as well as the famous bird fossils from the same sedimentary rocks. One specimen of Sinornithosaurus may have sported a coat patterned in black and russet, while Sinosauropteryx seems to have had a tail and back crest striped in shades of red-brown. Could this be for camouflage, display or some aspect of regulating heat? The big leap follows some 6 months on from the discovery of melanosomes in bird feathers from Eocene oil shales in Germany, that may have given them a starling- or hummingbird-like iridescent sheen (Vinther, J. et al. 2009. Structural coloration in a fossil feather. Biology Letters, v. 6, p. 128-131). The huge diversity of modern coloration among birds, from feathers and in the skins of lizards is widely believed to function primarily as a species-dependent means of display, with some influence from camouflage and thermal properties. Whichever, it must have been an integral aspect of speciation for a very long time indeed, yet even the best fossils cannot yield full ornament information, and reconstructions will rely on artistic licence, but now with a little more confidence that creatures didn’t just come in one colour, like Model-T Fords.
To spice up the stereotypical view that ginger = bad-tempered it seems that as well as being mottled with that hue Sinornithosaurus may have been venomous (Gong, E. et al. 2010. The birdlike raptor Sinornithosaurus was venomous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, v. 107 p. 766-768). Its skull shows grooved teeth, the grooves leading to a pocket at the base of the teeth. It may also have evolved to feed on birds…