Gravity survey reveals signs of Archaean tectonics in Canadian Shield

Much of the Archaean Eon is represented by cratons, which occur at the core of continental parts of tectonic plates. Having low geothermal heat flow they are the most rigid parts of the continental crust.  The Superior Craton is an area that makes up much of the eastern part of the Canadian Shield, and formed during the Late Archaean from ~4.3 to 2.6 billion years (Ga) ago. Covering an area in excess of 1.5 million km2, it is the world’s largest craton. One of its most intensely studied components is the Abitibi Terrane, which hosts many mines. A granite-greenstone terrain, it consists of volcano-sedimentary supracrustal rocks in several typically linear greenstone belts separated by areas of mainly intrusive granitic bodies. Many Archaean terrains show much the same ‘stripey’ aspect on the grand scale. Greenstone belts are dominated by metamorphosed basaltic volcanic rock, together with lesser proportions of ultramafic lavas and intrusions, and overlying metasedimentary rocks, also of Archaean age. Various hypotheses have been suggested for the formation of granite-greenstone terrains, the latest turning to a process of ‘sagduction’. However the relative flat nature of cratonic areas tells geologists little about their deeper parts. They tend to have resisted large-scale later deformation by their very nature, so none have been tilted or wholly obducted onto other such stable crustal masses during later collisional tectonic processes. Geophysics does offer insights however, using seismic profiling, geomagnetic and gravity surveys.

The Geological Survey of Canada has produced masses of geophysical data as a means of coping with the vast size and logistical challenges of the Canadian Shield. Recently five Canadian geoscientists have used gravity data from the Canadian Geodetic Survey to model the deep crust beneath the huge Abitibi granite-greenstone terrain, specifically addressing variations in its density in three dimensions. They also used cross sections produced by seismic reflection and refraction data along 2-D survey lines (Galley, C. et al. 2025. Archean rifts and triple-junctions revealed by gravity modeling of the southern Superior Craton. Nature Communications, v. 16, article 8872; DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63931-z). The group found that entirely new insights emerge from the variation in crustal density down to its base at the Moho (Mohorovičić discontinuity). These data show large linear bulges in the Moho separated by broad zones of thicker crust.

Geology of the Abitibi Terrane (upper),; Depth to the Moho beneath the Abitibi Terrane with rifts and VMS deposits superimposed (lower). Credit: After Galley et al. Figs 1 and 5.

Galley et al. suggest that the zones are former sites of lithospheric extensional tectonics and crustal thinning: rifts from which ultramafic to mafic magmas emerged. They consider them to be akin to modern mid-ocean and continental rifts. Most of the rifts roughly parallel the trend of the greenstone belts and the large, long-lived faults that run west to east across the Abitibi Terrain. This suggests that rifts formed under the more ductile lithospheric condition of the Neoarchaean set the gross fabric of the granites and greenstones. Moreover, there are signs of two triple junctions where three rifts converge: fundamental features of modern plate tectonics. However, both rifts and junctions are on a smaller scale than those active at present. The rift patterns suggest plate tectonics in miniature, perhaps indicative of more vigorous mantle convection during the Archaean Eon.

There is an interesting spin-off. The Abitibi Terrane is rich in a variety of mineral resources, especially volcanic massive-sulfide deposits (VMS). Most of them are associated with the suggested rift zones. Such deposits form through sea-floor hydrothermal processes, which Archaean rifting and triple junctions would have focused to generate clusters of ‘black smokers’ precipitating large amounts of metal sulfides. Galley et al’s work is set to be applied to other large cratons, including those that formed earlier in the Archaean: the Pilbara and Kaapvaal cratons of Australia and South Africa. That could yield better insights into earlier tectonic processes and test some of the hypotheses proposed for them

See also: Archaean Rifts, Triple Junctions Mapped via Gravity Modeling. Scienmag, 6 October 2025

How continental keels and cratons may have formed

There is Byzantine ring to the word craton: hardly surprising as it stems from the Greek kratos meaning ‘might’ or ‘strength’. Yes, the ancient cores of the continents were well named, for they are mighty. Some continents, such as Africa, have several of them: probably relics of very ancient supercontinents that have split and spread again and again. Cratons overlie what are almost literally the ‘keels’ of continents. Unlike other mantle lithosphere beneath continental crust (150 km on average) cratonic lithosphere extends down to 350 km and is rigid. Upper mantle rocks at that depth elsewhere are mechanically weaker and constitute the asthenosphere. Geologists only have evidence from the near-surface on which to base ideas of how cratons formed. Their exposed rocks are always Precambrian in age, from 1.5 to 3.5 billion years old, though in some cases they are covered by a thin veneer of later sedimentary rocks that show little sign of deformation. No cratons formed after the Palaeoproterozoic and they are the main repositories of Archaean rock. Their crust is thicker than elsewhere and dominated at the surface by crystalline rocks of roughly granitic composition. Cratons have the lowest amount of heat flowing out from the Earth’s interior; i.e. heat produced by the decay of long-lived radioactive isotopes of uranium, thorium and potassium. This relative coolness provides an explanation for the rigidity of cratons relative to younger continental lithosphere. Because granitic rocks are well-endowed with heat-producing isotopes, the implication of low heat flow is that the deeper parts of the crust are strongly depleted in them. As a result the deep mantle in cratonic keels is at higher pressure and lower temperature than elsewhere beneath the continental surface. Ideal conditions for the formation of diamonds in mantle rock, so that cratonic keels are their main source – they get to the surface in magma pipes when small amounts of partial melting take place in the lithospheric mantle.

The low heat flow through cratons beckons the idea that the heat-producing elements U, Th and K were at some stage driven from depth. An attractive hypothesis is that they were carried in low-density granitic magmas formed by partial melting of mantle lithosphere during the Precambrian that rose to form continental crust. Yet there is an abundance of younger granite plutons that are associated with thinner continental lithosphere. This seeming paradox suggests different kinds of magmagenesis and tectonics during the early Precambrian. Russian and Australian geoscientists have proposed an ingenious explanation (Perchuk, A.L. et al. 2020. Building cratonic keels in Precambrian plate tectonics. Nature, v. 586, p. 395-401; DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2806-7). The key to their hypothesis lies in the 2-layered nature of mantle keels beneath cratons, as revealed by seismic studies. Modelling of the data suggests that the layering resulted from different degrees of partial melting in the upper mantle during Precambrian subduction.

Development of a cratonic keel from melt-depleted lithospheric mantle during early Precambrian subduction. Mantle temperature is 250°C higher than it is today. The oceanic lithosphere being subducted in (a) has become a series of stagnant slabs in (b) (credit: Perchuk et al.; Fig. 2)

Perchuk et al. suggest that high degrees of partial melting of mantle associated with subduction zones produced the bulk of magma that formed the Archaean and Palaeoproterozoic crust. This helps explain large differences between the bulk compositions of ancient and more recent continental crust, which involves less melting. The residue left by high degrees of melting of mantle rock in the early Precambrian would have had a lower density than the rest of the mantle. While older oceanic crust at ancient subduction zones would be transformed to a state denser than the mantle as a whole and thus able to sink, this depleted lithospheric mantle would not. In its hot ductile state following partial melting, this mantle would be ‘peeled’ from the associated oceanic crust to be emplaced below. The figure shows one of several outcomes of a complex magmatic-thermomechanical model ‘driven’ by assumed Archaean conditions in the upper mantle and lithosphere An excellent summary of modern ideas on the start of plate tectonics and evolution of the continents is given by:Hawkesworth, C.J., Cawood, P.A. & Dhuime, B. 2020. The evolution of the continental crust and the onset of plate tectonics. In Topic: The early Earth crust and its formation, Frontiers in Earth Sciences; DOI: 10.3389/feart.2020.00326